On Oct 12, 2006, at 5:01 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:

+1.  Sessions might be a good example of a storage using
'fsync-behavior=None':  you would get the speedup, and the ability to
survive a restart, without needing to treat the data as "precious".

This is an interesting point, and it makes me wonder if
there would be interest having the fsync behavior vary on
a per-transaction basis instead of a per-storage basis.
Maybe the client submitting transactions that are just
Session-like changes could include a message to the server
indicating that this transaction is not precious.

For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:

ZODB-Dev mailing list  -  ZODB-Dev@zope.org

Reply via email to