Jim Fulton wrote at 2008-10-1 13:40 -0400:
> ...
>> It may well be that a restart *may* not lead into a fully functional
>> state (though this would indicate a storage bug)
>
>A failure in tpc_finish already indicates a storage bug.
Maybe -- although "file system is full" might not be so easy to a
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 09:55 +0200, Dieter Maurer wrote:
> Jim Fulton wrote at 2008-10-1 13:40 -0400:
> > ...
> >> It may well be that a restart *may* not lead into a fully functional
> >> state (though this would indicate a storage bug)
> >
> >A failure in tpc_finish already indicates a storage bug
Christian Theune wrote at 2008-10-3 10:32 +0200:
>On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 09:55 +0200, Dieter Maurer wrote:
>> Jim Fulton wrote at 2008-10-1 13:40 -0400:
>> > ...
>> >> It may well be that a restart *may* not lead into a fully functional
>> >> state (though this would indicate a storage bug)
>> >
>>
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 10:51 +0200, Dieter Maurer wrote:
> That's true for a "FileStorage" -- but it may not be that easy for
> other storages (e.g. "BSDDB" storage).
Those storages using another system in the backend have to rely on them
providing a two-phase commit API which needs to implement th
Hi!
In which scope does zodb preserve object uniqueness?
The problem I'm having is I have Person-objects in two places, in a set of
persons (root[Person], which is an OOSet) and in name-index (root[(Name,
Person)], which is a OOBTree).
Now if I find people by name from the name index, they seem
Hi, I wonder if anyone can help me.
I've got a custom Python cgi which runs in one directory using ZODB for
the database. It runs in a directory off the site root ie. /System
It's got a bit unwieldy in there so I wanted to separate the core
modules out as I don't really touch them any more, so ad
On Oct 3, 2008, at 3:55 AM, Dieter Maurer wrote:
> Jim Fulton wrote at 2008-10-1 13:40 -0400:
>> ...
>>> It may well be that a restart *may* not lead into a fully functional
>>> state (though this would indicate a storage bug)
>>
>> A failure in tpc_finish already indicates a storage bug.
>
> May
I think I know now -- objects compare identical and equal only if they are
in the same container object. (Check the code below)
I don't mean to be negative, but why can't ZODB be like a big RAM? Like
when i store an object to multiple places on the same DB, then it would
actually be the same in ea
Hi,
On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 15:57 +0300, Markus Läll wrote:
> I think I know now -- objects compare identical and equal only if they are
> in the same container object. (Check the code below)
>
> I don't mean to be negative, but why can't ZODB be like a big RAM? Like
> when i store an object to mul
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Markus Läll wrote:
> I think I know now -- objects compare identical and equal only if they are
> in the same container object. (Check the code below)
>
> I don't mean to be negative, but why can't ZODB be like a big RAM? Like
> when i store an object
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 11:37:35AM +0100, Adam wrote:
> Hi, I wonder if anyone can help me.
>
> I've got a custom Python cgi which runs in one directory using ZODB for
> the database. It runs in a directory off the site root ie. /System
>
> It's got a bit unwieldy in there so I wanted to separate
On Sep 25, 2008, at 6:31 AM, Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Sep 25, 2008, at 1:12 AM, Jeff Shell wrote:
>> In ZODB 3.8.0, while prepping a customer's site to go from staging to
>> production and doing a fair amount of big operations, we started
>> seeing conflict errors. It was a 200MB cache size, with a p
On Oct 3, 2008, at 2:34 PM, Jeff Shell wrote:
> On Sep 25, 2008, at 6:31 AM, Jim Fulton wrote:
>> On Sep 25, 2008, at 1:12 AM, Jeff Shell wrote:
>>> In ZODB 3.8.0, while prepping a customer's site to go from staging
>>> to
>>> production and doing a fair amount of big operations, we started
>>>
Marius Gedminas wrote:
> 1. create modules in their old locations that import all the classes
> from the new locations (and do nothing else).
> 2. write a script that opens the DB, iterates over all persistent
> objects in it, touches every single one of them (obj._p_activate()
>
14 matches
Mail list logo
