Re: [ZODB-Dev] Making ZODB / ZEO faster

2009-12-04 Thread Fred Drake
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Erik Dahl wrote: >  I'm guessing the indexes > are a hotspot (haven't tested this out much though I guess b-tree's > buckets should alleviate this problem some).  (is there a persistent > queue around?) Cataloging certainly can be a hot spot. Check out zc.catalogq

[ZODB-Dev] 64-bit BTrees

2006-04-13 Thread Fred Drake
I have a need for 64-bit BTrees (at least for IOBTree and OIBTree), and I'm not the first. I've created a feature development branch for this, and checked in my initial implementation. I've modified the existing code to use PY_LONG_LONG instead of int for the key and/or value type; there's no lon

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Re: [Zope-dev] Re: 64-bit BTrees

2006-04-17 Thread Fred Drake
On 4/17/06, Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The fact that IIBTrees is so widely used is exatly the reason > I want to use 64-bits for the existing types rather than having to > introduce a new type. Oops, I was checking in the separated version of 64-bit BTrees while this was landing in my

[ZODB-Dev] Re: 64-bit BTrees

2006-04-21 Thread Fred Drake
On 4/13/06, Fred Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've created a feature development branch for > this, and checked in my initial implementation. I've made another branch for this, with a different twist. I'm not sure it'll be interesting, but I think it'l

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Re: [Zope-Annce] Technical Preview of Blob support in ZODB

2006-05-18 Thread Fred Drake
On 5/18/06, Stephan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have already created the 3.7 branch, so no more new features in 3.7. However, ZODB 3.7 might be an internal release only used by Zope 3.3 and 2.10. Have there been any new features since 3.6? I wonder if maintaining yet another branch ca

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Re: [Zope-Annce] Technical Preview of Blob support in ZODB

2006-05-20 Thread Fred Drake
On Thursday 18 May 2006 14:34, Fred Drake wrote: Have there been any new features since 3.6? I wonder if maintaining yet another branch can be avoided. On 5/20/06, Stephan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I dunno; I just follow the pattern. ;-) Ok, I took a (very quick) look

Re: [ZODB-Dev] We need to pay down debt

2006-10-05 Thread Fred Drake
On 10/5/06, Dmitry Vasiliev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What do you think about to use an API documentation tool, epydoc (http://epydoc.sourceforge.net/) for example? Unfortunately I haven't used it myself yet, but the examples looks promising (for example: http://epydoc.sourceforge.net/api/epydoc

Re: [ZODB-Dev] zc.recipe.zeo

2007-08-02 Thread Fred Drake
On 8/3/07, David Pratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi there. zc.recipe.zeo has not yet made it to the cheeseshop. It would > be great if someone could put it there. If you want me to do it that is > fine since I have other packages on cheeseshop. The port for zeo on is > also hardcoded for 8100 bu

Re: [ZODB-Dev] zc.recipe.zeo

2007-08-03 Thread Fred Drake
On 8/3/07, Jens Vagelpohl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just setting the number of threads to 1 won't improve anything. Their > strategy is to use many instances with a single thread instead of a > few instances with the default number of threads. For a single > instance you'll do more harm than goo

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Rename top-level svn dir to ZODB3?

2007-10-04 Thread Fred Drake
On 10/4/07, Philipp von Weitershausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since we can't easily rename the ZODB3 egg to ZODB (dependencies would > break), I suggest we rename the subversion directory to 'ZODB3'. Then at > least it'll be consistent. In which case svn:externals can break. It's a pain, but

Re: [ZODB-Dev] what could cause this kind of cache corruption?

2008-07-31 Thread Fred Drake
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > However, I suspect the difference-that-makes-a-difference is the persistent > cache files. With non-persistent cache files, iirc, the files are stored in > /tmp as temp files under unique names, so this kind of problem can

Re: [ZODB-Dev] what could cause this kind of cache corruption?

2008-07-31 Thread Fred Drake
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > They aren't part of the ZODB 3.8 but part of the trunk/3.9 - right? These are bug fixes, and will be included in ZODB 3.8.1. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. "Chaos is the score upon which reality is written." --Henry Mil

Re: [ZODB-Dev] what could cause this kind of cache corruption?

2008-08-01 Thread Fred Drake
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 3:28 AM, Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are you referring to Christian and Shane's patches here? No, only to Jim's. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. "Chaos is the score upon which reality is written." --Henry Miller __

Re: [ZODB-Dev] conflict errors in persistent ZEO client cache

2008-09-25 Thread Fred Drake
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 8:31 AM, Jim Fulton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since ZODB 3.8.0, I have fixed *many* ZEO cache bugs. What you > describe is one symptom. I suggest upgrading to 3.8.0b8. I suspect Jim means 3.8.1b8. -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. "Chaos is the score upon which reality

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Python 3

2008-12-05 Thread Fred Drake
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there a roadmap for getting ZODB to work on Python 3 or is that > beyond the realms of possibility? > > Possibly, using a Python 2 ZEO server and connecting using a Python 3 > ClientStorage? I can't speak for Jim, but here's my