--On 27. Juni 2005 11:56:13 -0400 Tim Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[Sidnei da Silva]
I would expect a 2.8.1 soon, as in no longer than 3 weeks from now tops.
There's this bug which I would consider 'serious' and another issue with
the last-minute inclusion of BTreeFolder2 breaking CMF 1.
[Sidnei da Silva]
> I would expect a 2.8.1 soon, as in no longer than 3 weeks from now tops.
> There's this bug which I would consider 'serious' and another issue with
> the last-minute inclusion of BTreeFolder2 breaking CMF 1.5. IANRM though.
I haven't seen anything about 2.8.1 yet from its relea
Tim Peters wrote:
[Tim Peters]
...
More tests would be appreciated! Since nobody looks at most of this code
most of the time, tests are the only reliable defense we have. Jim
"confessed" last week that he deliberately didn't write TmpStore tests
originally because TmpStore is "an internal i
On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 09:43:43PM -0400, Tim Peters wrote:
| I'll make an internal 3.4.1a1 release and stitch that into Zope 2.8 branch
| and Zope trunk tomorrow. "Internal" means I skip most of the steps in a
| full-blown release (will not create a ZODB tarball or Windows installers,
| will not
[Tim Peters]
>> This was fixed a few weeks [ago], in rev 30825:
>>
>> http://svn.zope.org/ZODB/branches/3.4/?rev=30825&view=rev
[Sidnei da Silva]
> Ah, there we go. So that was fixed after 3.4.0 was tagged, and Zope 2.8
> branch still points to the 3.4.0 tag.
All correct!
> Guess we need a n
On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 12:41:40PM -0400, Tim Peters wrote:
| [Sidnei da Silva]
| > There's a collector issue open against ZODB 3.3 [Issue 5166], but the
| > bug is still present in 3.4 and trunk.
|
| Can you be more specific, then? As I pointed out last time, rev 30825
| attempted to delegate lo
On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 12:27:57PM -0400, Tim Peters wrote:
| This was fixed a few weeks, in rev 30825:
|
| http://svn.zope.org/ZODB/branches/3.4/?rev=30825&view=rev
Ah, there we go. So that was fixed after 3.4.0 was tagged, and Zope
2.8 branch still points to the 3.4.0 tag. Guess we need a n
[Sidnei da Silva]
> There's a collector issue open against ZODB 3.3 [Issue 5166], but the
> bug is still present in 3.4 and trunk.
Can you be more specific, then? As I pointed out last time, rev 30825
attempted to delegate loadBefore, and the new test for it passes (but failed
before the change T
[Sidnei da Silva]
> We've hit a case where loadBefore would get called on TmpStore during
> plone.org migration.
>
> Unfortunately TmpStore doesn't implement loadBefore. There seems to be no
> tests for this. I tried to write one and provide a fix but just occurred
> me that TmpStore tries to be a
On Sun, Jun 26, 2005 at 01:09:54PM -0300, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
| We've hit a case where loadBefore would get called on TmpStore during
| plone.org migration.
|
| Unfortunately TmpStore doesn't implement loadBefore. There seems to be
| no tests for this. I tried to write one and provide a fix bu
10 matches
Mail list logo
