On 2010-11-17 18:12, Shane Hathaway wrote:
No, RelStorage does not require two phase commit support from
the database. It turns out that a simple commit lock, which is
sufficient for preventing deadlocks and unreported conflicts
Are there any
On 11/19/2010 10:39 AM, Sachin Tekale wrote:
On 2010-11-17 18:12, Shane Hathaway wrote:
No, RelStorage does not require two phase commit support from the
database. It turns out that a simple commit lock, which is
sufficient for preventing deadlocks and unreported conflicts
Are there any
I have read that there is a problem to implement MS-SQL adapter for
Relstorage because the “Two phase commit” feature is not exposed by
MS-SQL server .
unsure about that. probably depends on the client access library.
Is there solution to overcome this problem, Without introducing too many
On 17 November 2010 16:34, Alan Runyan runy...@gmail.com wrote:
I have read that there is a problem to implement MS-SQL adapter for
Relstorage because the “Two phase commit” feature is not exposed by
MS-SQL server .
unsure about that. probably depends on the client access library.
At least
On 17 November 2010 17:05, Laurence Rowe l...@lrowe.co.uk wrote:
On 17 November 2010 16:34, Alan Runyan runy...@gmail.com wrote:
I have read that there is a problem to implement MS-SQL adapter for
Relstorage because the “Two phase commit” feature is not exposed by
MS-SQL server .
unsure
On 11/17/2010 08:29 AM, Sachin Tekale wrote:
Hi all,
I have read that there is a problem to implement MS-SQL adapter for
Relstorage because the “Two phase commit” feature is not exposed by
MS-SQL server .
No, RelStorage does not require two phase commit support from the
database. It turns
On 11/17/2010 11:12 AM, Shane Hathaway wrote:
On 11/17/2010 08:29 AM, Sachin Tekale wrote:
Hi all,
I have read that there is a problem to implement MS-SQL adapter for
Relstorage because the “Two phase commit” feature is not exposed by
MS-SQL server .
No, RelStorage does not require two
