Steve Lawrence wrote:
We have a generic rctl/global-zone safety issue that needs to be addressed.
It would seem simple enough to just make project 0 processes in the global
zone exempt from zone rctls. This would allow apps in the global zone to
be capped without affecting system daemons.
Yes please. This is a common request for the scenerios you describe and to me
seems a logical addtion to the existing lwps control at a zone granularity.
Applying the control on the global zone is interesting, but not as important as
having the control per non-global zones.
/jason
This
Hi
I have found in the past that it is frustrating to find resources
rctl that is not in sync between projects and zones definitions and
as a costumer I would like to see them in sync.
It would also enable me to isolate applications in zones that tend to
blow up the zone where I have other
