I look forward to seeing JeffS's results. Other tests I have done with
multiple connections between multiple zones also showed no overhead. But
those tests did not include large numbers of connection creations per second.
But there really isn't any extra code if the packet is traveling betwee
When I get a chance, I'll reproduce many connections/s (instead of
bytes/s) across zones, compared to intra-zone, using Apache's 'ab' tool,
and report what I get. -- Jeff
Gino Ruopolo wrote:
I would not read too much into those values, but I
think that it is safe to
conclude that there is li
> I would not read too much into those values, but I
> think that it is safe to
> conclude that there is little difference in network
> performance among those
> situations. The two situations you have described
> are (4) and (5).
In my setup I have about 1000 connection/s, not a single connect
Gino Ruopolo wrote:
Are both Zones running on the same storage? Maybe
you've moved your DB
to faster storage?
no, same file system
Or maybe you've been playing with routing tables?
no at all.
gino
This message posted from opensolaris.org
__
> Are both Zones running on the same storage? Maybe
> you've moved your DB
> to faster storage?
no, same file system
> Or maybe you've been playing with routing tables?
no at all.
gino
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zones-discuss mai
