Re: [zones-discuss] Newbie: Just upgraded from 2008.11 to 2009.06 and zone

2009-06-15 Thread Ian
the UID is not your problem. the problem is that uninstalled is not a valid zone state. (sorry, i just checked my sent emails and i did indeed tell you to set the state to uninstalled, my bad.) the proper state is configured. Aha ! That's suberb: thank you. Everything is back up and

[zones-discuss] s10 brand code review

2009-06-15 Thread Jerry Jelinek
I need a code review for the fix for: ssh dumping core on maramba There is a webrev at: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~gjelinek/webrev.crypto/ Thanks, Jerry ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org

[zones-discuss] Fwd: Re: snv domU + zones ?

2009-06-15 Thread Edward Pilatowicz
this is just a heads up about: 6738714 guest domains should be able to use multiple unicast addresses this bug prevents zones from using vnics when inside of domUs. (it's an old bug but it just came to my attention, so i figured it might be news to others as well.) ed - Forwarded

Re: [zones-discuss] s10 brand code review

2009-06-15 Thread Edward Pilatowicz
- you might want to add the crypto libraries to the list of libraries to watch for breakage. ;) - to improve the readability of crypto_ioctl(), could you make a dedicated function or macro that just does translation between the s10 and nevada versions of crypto_get_function_list_t? - when

Re: [zones-discuss] s10 brand code review

2009-06-15 Thread Edward Pilatowicz
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 11:54:46AM -0600, Jerry Jelinek wrote: Ed, Thanks for reviewing this. Edward Pilatowicz wrote: - you might want to add the crypto libraries to the list of libraries to watch for breakage. ;) Yep. :-) I'm also going to try to see if any of the other default

Re: [zones-discuss] s10 brand code review

2009-06-15 Thread Jerry Jelinek
Jordan Vaughan wrote: I have a few nits. Some of them (such at [3]) might be ridiculously trivial, so I won't complain if you don't take them into account. Jordan, Thanks for reviewing this. I'll make all of the simplifications you suggested. Thanks again, Jerry

[zones-discuss] 2 line code review...

2009-06-15 Thread Edward Pilatowicz
hey all, could i get a code review for this two line change: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~edp/onnv-bugs1/ 6850112 zonecfg verify should verify the native brand type thanks ed ___ zones-discuss mailing list zones-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [zones-discuss] 2 line code review...

2009-06-15 Thread Dan Price
On Mon 15 Jun 2009 at 03:42PM, Edward Pilatowicz wrote: hey all, could i get a code review for this two line change: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~edp/onnv-bugs1/ 6850112 zonecfg verify should verify the native brand type Looks good. I assume that on SXCE the native brand verify

Re: [zones-discuss] 2 line code review...

2009-06-15 Thread Edward Pilatowicz
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 03:46:29PM -0700, Dan Price wrote: On Mon 15 Jun 2009 at 03:42PM, Edward Pilatowicz wrote: hey all, could i get a code review for this two line change: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~edp/onnv-bugs1/ 6850112 zonecfg verify should verify the native brand type

Re: [zones-discuss] 2 line code review...

2009-06-15 Thread Jordan Vaughan
Edward Pilatowicz wrote: hey all, could i get a code review for this two line change: http://cr.opensolaris.org/~edp/onnv-bugs1/ 6850112 zonecfg verify should verify the native brand type thanks ed ___ zones-discuss mailing list