I think this is the same issue as CR 6798104. There is a workaround you
can try which is documented in the report, which is use a df utility
Get a private copy of df from a Solaris 10 8/07 or 120011-14 and use the
*private* copy when you need to check on the filesystem status.
*** DO NOT replace the df binary that comes with S10U6 with an older version ***
Ellard Roush wrote:
Hi,
The question raised by Sunil seems to be a zones question.
Does anyone have an explanation or is this a bug ?
Regards,
Ellard
Original Message
Subject: df -h in zone cluster
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:28:38 -0400
From: Sunil Sohani
To: sunclus...@sun.com
Hi,
IHAC running "zone clusters". They are are running some monitoring
software within zone cluster which does "df -h" to monitor disk space.
Here is sample output:
# df -h
Filesystem size used avail capacity Mounted on
/0K 8.1G13G39%/
/dev21G 8.1G13G39%/dev
/lib31G 9.6G21G32%/lib
/platform 31G 9.6G21G32%/platform
/sbin 31G 9.6G21G32%/sbin
/usr31G 9.6G21G32%/usr
/usr/local 31G 9.6G21G32%/usr/local
proc 0K 0K 0K 0%/proc
ctfs 0K 0K 0K 0%/system/contract
mnttab 0K 0K 0K 0%/etc/mnttab
objfs0K 0K 0K 0%/system/object
swap17G 376K17G 1%/etc/svc/volatile
fd 0K 0K 0K 0%/dev/fd
swap17G64K17G 1%/tmp
swap17G56K17G 1%/var/run
/sbin 31G 9.6G21G32%/var/cluster/sbin.org
/usr/cluster/lib/sc/ifconfig_client_proxy
31G 9.6G21G32%/sbin/ifconfig
zdtgdbq01/odb0K29K86G 1%/odb
zdtgdbq01/odb/dtg02/flashdata01
0K 5.1G 4.9G52%
/odb/dtg02/flashdata01
zdtgdbq01/odb/dtg02/oraarch
0K 525M 9.5G 6%/odb/dtg02/oraarch
zdtgdbq01/odb/dtg02/orabackup
0K14M 10.0G 1%/odb/dtg02/orabackup
zdtgdbq01/odb/dtg02/orabin
0K 2.2G 7.8G22%/odb/dtg02/orabin
zdtgdbq01/odb/dtg02/oradata01
0K 1.2G 8.8G12%/odb/dtg02/oradata01
zdtgdbq01/odb/dtg02/oradata02
0K 1.3G 8.7G13%/odb/dtg02/oradata02
zdtgdbq01/odb/oem01/orabin
0K 1.9G 8.1G19%/odb/oem01/orabin
zdtgdbq01 is a ZFS pool used for Oracle database that has been added
to this "zone cluster". Monitoring software looks at "size" column and
sees "0K" and starts sending alerts.
Is there a solution for this? Or is that how it is going to be and
they need to change the way they monitor it?
Customer thinks they haven't configured the resource group properly.
Sunil
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
--
---
__ Joseph Balenzano
/_/\ ISV Engineering
/ \\ \ Sun Microsystems Inc.
/_\ \\ / joseph.balenz...@sun.com
/_/ \/ / /Phone/Fax 203.653.4186
/_/ / \//\
\_\//\ / /
\_/ / /\ /
\_/ \\ \
\_\ \\
\_\/
--
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org
