> > Should these functions be dealing with "link names" rather than
> > "interfaces" to avoid confusion with the interfaces that ifconfig(1M)
> > deals with?
>
> Good point.
> We've renamed them to have "datalink" in their names.
> Jerry also pointed out that we should be more careful abou
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Erik,
Here are my belated comments on the IP Instances design.
And here are my belated responses. But we've already acted on the
comments that affect the design and code, and I'll make sure the Zones
documentation covers the other documentation items.
There are tw
Erik,
One additional comment I meant to include is that I think it would be
useful to add a paragraph on what is possible today with the current
stack in terms of sharing a link versus what will be possible with IP
instances (using separate physical NICs or VLANs) versus what will be
possible onc
Erik,
Here are my belated comments on the IP Instances design.
There are two documents which describe the design
si-interfaces - a high-level design focusing on the problem the
project solves, and what the user-visible changes are
A general comment that in both documents page
