Re: [zones-discuss] static routes vs default routes (zones in different subnets)

2008-11-12 Thread Nicolas Dorfsman
Hi all, I'm pleased to read I'm not the sole victim of what I'm calling the solaris zone route bug. Please take a look below to my comment. Le 10 nov. 08 à 17:51, Tommy McNeely a écrit : On Nov 10, 2008, at 7:09 AM, Paul Kraus wrote: On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 10:34 PM, Tommy

Re: [zones-discuss] static routes vs default routes (zones in different subnets)

2008-11-10 Thread Paul Kraus
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 10:34 PM, Tommy McNeely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The problem I ran into this time was that static routes don't seem to use the same intelligence that default routes do. For example, in the snip At least as of 10U5 your observation is correct. I tried getting Sun

Re: [zones-discuss] static routes vs default routes (zones in different subnets)

2008-11-10 Thread Tommy McNeely
On Nov 10, 2008, at 7:09 AM, Paul Kraus wrote: On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 10:34 PM, Tommy McNeely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The problem I ran into this time was that static routes don't seem to use the same intelligence that default routes do. For example, in the snip At least as of

[zones-discuss] static routes vs default routes (zones in different subnets)

2008-11-09 Thread Tommy McNeely
Hello, As I previously mentioned, I am working on the possibility of putting zones from different security contexts (front-end, application, back- end) into the same physical server, which is effectively putting zones in more than one subnet. We also like to use a load balancer, at least