Re: [zones-discuss] routeing in zones

2006-05-28 Thread Peter Memishian

  I will most likely be able to test it once it is there - it would be easier
  for me to test against S10 than it would be against Nevada.  However,
  assuming these changes fall within usr/src/cmd-inet/usr.lib/in.mpathd and
  not somewhere under usr/src/uts, it would probably be pretty
  straight-forward for me to build and test it against S10.

Indeed; the fix involves just 5 lines of changes to in.mpathd (though the
function being changed was recently overhauled by my fix for 6397456 --
but I think it should still be straightforward).

  As such, if it makes it into Nevada (or you send me diffs) in the next
  couple of days, I should be able to test it this week.

It would be great if we could verify this fixes your issues before going
back to Nevada.

  I also have a case open against this problem, and will be looking for a test
  binary and patch through official support channels.

Is there a CR open yet?

--
meem
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org


Re: [zones-discuss] routeing in zones

2006-05-24 Thread Peter Memishian

  I find that when I do cable pulls (pull bge0, replace bge0, pull bge1,
  replace bge1) that a zone IP address has been transitioned to a test
  address.  Yuck!

A test address?  It actually ends up with IFF_NOFAILOVER set?

-- 
meem
___
zones-discuss mailing list
zones-discuss@opensolaris.org