Thanks for the feedback. Nigel noticed this as well, slated for next
release:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-241
Patrick
Doug Cutting wrote:
+1
I note that 'ant clean test' fails, since the build requires an svn
checkout, but 'ant test' on a release succeeds. It would be b
+1. Tests pass fine for me.
-Flavio
On Nov 25, 2008, at 2:50 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
I've created a second candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.0.1.
*** Please download, test and VOTE before the
*** vote closes EOD on Friday, November 28.***
http://people.apache.org/~phunt/zookeeper-3.0.1-candida
+1
I note that 'ant clean test' fails, since the build requires an svn
checkout, but 'ant test' on a release succeeds. It would be best if the
build worked without a subversion checkout. But that's a nit.
Doug
Patrick Hunt wrote:
I've created a second candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.0.1.
+1, units, etc.. pass for me.
Nigel Daley wrote:
+1. Signature and MD5 check out. Unit tests pass.
I filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-241 but don't
think it's a blocker for this release (it's not a regression from 3.0)
Nige
On 11/24/08 5:50 PM, "Patrick Hunt" <[EMAIL
+1. Signature and MD5 check out. Unit tests pass.
I filed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-241 but don't
think it's a blocker for this release (it's not a regression from 3.0)
Nige
On 11/24/08 5:50 PM, "Patrick Hunt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Patrick Hunt <[EMAIL PRO
+1 .. I ran ant test and some command line testing on a quorum of 3 on a
single node.
mahadev
On 11/24/08 5:50 PM, "Patrick Hunt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've created a second candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.0.1.
>
> *** Please download, test and VOTE before the
> *** vote closes EOD on
+1
This candidate passes our tests. Thanks again Patrick!
Stu
-Original Message-
From: "Patrick Hunt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 8:50pm
To: zookeeper-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Release ZooKeeper 3.0.1 (candidate 1)
I've created a second candidate buil
