[jira] Updated: (ZOOKEEPER-823) update ZooKeeper java client to optionally use Netty for connections

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-823?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Thomas Koch updated ZOOKEEPER-823: -- Attachment: testWatchAutoResetWithPending_FAILURE I did 10 builds now in total with the

[jira] Created: (ZOOKEEPER-894) add Package o.a.Zookeeper.Client

add Package o.a.Zookeeper.Client Key: ZOOKEEPER-894 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-894 Project: Zookeeper Issue Type: Sub-task Reporter: Thomas Koch -- This message is

[jira] Updated: (ZOOKEEPER-894) add Package o.a.Zookeeper.Client

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Thomas Koch updated ZOOKEEPER-894: -- Description: I'd like to move classes that are not part of the API but belong to the ZK

What's the QA strategy of ZooKeeper?

Hi, after filling 13 refactoring issues against the Java Client code[1], I started to dig into the server site code to understand the last issues with the Netty stuff. I feel bad. It's this feeling of I don't wanna hurt you, but ZooKeeper is quite an important piece of the Hadoop ecosystem

[jira] Commented: (ZOOKEEPER-860) Add alternative search-provider to ZK site

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12920547#action_12920547 ] Otis Gospodnetic commented on ZOOKEEPER-860: For what it's worth, the

[jira] Commented: (ZOOKEEPER-890) C client invokes watcher callbacks multiple times

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12920619#action_12920619 ] Patrick Hunt commented on ZOOKEEPER-890: Should this issue be closed then? (also

[jira] Updated: (ZOOKEEPER-891) Allow non-numeric version strings

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-891?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Patrick Hunt updated ZOOKEEPER-891: --- Fix Version/s: (was: 4.0.0) I noticed a similar issue when I attempted to move us to

[jira] Updated: (ZOOKEEPER-893) ZooKeeper high cpu usage when invalid requests

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-893?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Patrick Hunt updated ZOOKEEPER-893: --- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) ZooKeeper high cpu usage when invalid requests

[jira] Reopened: (ZOOKEEPER-804) c unit tests failing due to assertion cptr failed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-804?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Patrick Hunt reopened ZOOKEEPER-804: Reopening due to issue raised with the patch (see earlier comment). Is this an issue that

[jira] Updated: (ZOOKEEPER-893) ZooKeeper high cpu usage when invalid requests

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-893?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Patrick Hunt updated ZOOKEEPER-893: --- Fix Version/s: 3.4.0 3.3.2 ZooKeeper high cpu usage when invalid

[jira] Assigned: (ZOOKEEPER-893) ZooKeeper high cpu usage when invalid requests

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-893?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Patrick Hunt reassigned ZOOKEEPER-893: -- Assignee: Thijs Terlouw ZooKeeper high cpu usage when invalid requests

[jira] Commented: (ZOOKEEPER-894) add Package o.a.Zookeeper.Client

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12920645#action_12920645 ] Patrick Hunt commented on ZOOKEEPER-894: seems reasonable to me, however can you

[jira] Commented: (ZOOKEEPER-885) Zookeeper drops connections under moderate IO load

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12920646#action_12920646 ] Patrick Hunt commented on ZOOKEEPER-885: Flavio can you take a look at the

[jira] Commented: (ZOOKEEPER-885) Zookeeper drops connections under moderate IO load

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12920655#action_12920655 ] Patrick Hunt commented on ZOOKEEPER-885: I notice this in the server log

[jira] Resolved: (ZOOKEEPER-890) C client invokes watcher callbacks multiple times

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Austin Shoemaker resolved ZOOKEEPER-890. Resolution: Not A Problem Closing, C client works as intended. Submitted a

[jira] Updated: (ZOOKEEPER-894) add Package o.a.zookeeper.client

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-894?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Thomas Koch updated ZOOKEEPER-894: -- Description: I'd like to move classes that are not part of the API but belong to the ZK

[jira] Commented: (ZOOKEEPER-823) update ZooKeeper java client to optionally use Netty for connections

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-823?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12920686#action_12920686 ] Patrick Hunt commented on ZOOKEEPER-823: I ran the latest patch 4 times on my

[jira] Commented: (ZOOKEEPER-804) c unit tests failing due to assertion cptr failed

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-804?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12920689#action_12920689 ] Jared Cantwell commented on ZOOKEEPER-804: -- It seems like zookeeper_process

[jira] Commented: (ZOOKEEPER-885) Zookeeper drops connections under moderate IO load

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12920713#action_12920713 ] Flavio Junqueira commented on ZOOKEEPER-885: I remember a while back fixing

[jira] Commented: (ZOOKEEPER-823) update ZooKeeper java client to optionally use Netty for connections

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-823?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12920715#action_12920715 ] Thomas Koch commented on ZOOKEEPER-823: --- Hi Patrick, I saw the same exceptions as

[jira] Commented: (ZOOKEEPER-823) update ZooKeeper java client to optionally use Netty for connections

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-823?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12920734#action_12920734 ] Patrick Hunt commented on ZOOKEEPER-823: Sorry man, but I checked that, a few

[jira] Commented: (ZOOKEEPER-823) update ZooKeeper java client to optionally use Netty for connections

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-823?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12920737#action_12920737 ] Patrick Hunt commented on ZOOKEEPER-823: Thomas (also Mahadev and other

[jira] Commented: (ZOOKEEPER-823) update ZooKeeper java client to optionally use Netty for connections

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-823?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12920750#action_12920750 ] Thomas Koch commented on ZOOKEEPER-823: --- The problem with the failing

Restarting discussion on ZooKeeper as a TLP

In March of this year we discussed a request from the Apache Board, and Hadoop PMC, that we become a TLP rather than a subproject of Hadoop: Original discussion http://markmail.org/thread/42cobkpzlgotcbin I originally voted against this move, my primary concern being that we were not ready to

Re: Restarting discussion on ZooKeeper as a TLP

Excited to see ZooKeeper graduate to TLP. On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote: In March of this year we discussed a request from the Apache Board, and Hadoop PMC, that we become a TLP rather than a subproject of Hadoop: Original discussion