Hi All,
We will be using zookeeper quite extensively for clustering. Windows is one
of the platforms that we may need to support. Since Win32 is not supported
as a production platform I was wondering to what extent is zookeeper tested
on windows. We are also interested on using Zookeeper on Win64
Hi,
Any comments on the questions below? Depending upon the QA effort required,
we will be happy to contribute as well. Please let me know.
Regards,
-Vishal
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 5:06 PM, Vishal K vishalm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
We will be using zookeeper quite extensively
to confirm - is ZK using native code.
I have talked to a few guys around and they said it is fair to assume that
the programs are portable (to Windows) if they don't have native code. Just
wanted to check. Thanks.
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Vishal K vishalm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Patrick
are all b/w compat.
Patrick
On 04/02/2010 10:41 AM, Vishal K wrote:
Hi Patrick,
We have not upgraded to 3.3.0 yet. We are using 3.2.2. I did notice the
windows specific batch files in 3.3.0. How seemless is upgrade from 3.2.2
-
3.3.0?
I will let you know if I run into any windows
running on that platform
might also be useful? It would be great to offer (with confidence) ZK to
users of the windows platform.
Thanks for taking on this effort, regards,
Patrick
On 04/08/2010 03:21 PM, Vishal K wrote:
Hi Patrick, Mahadev,
I was going through the logs of junit tests (all
Hi Patrick,
I will check if the servers are underprovisioned. I have one cluster with 1
windows server + 2 Linux servers. I will submit the patch for the tests.
Thanks.
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
On 04/09/2010 07:01 AM, Vishal K wrote:
Hi Patrick
Hi Sergey,
This is a very useful feature. We would be happy to have it on our cluster.
One small suggestion - It will be nice if you could document things along
the way while going through the ZK code or testing ZK behavior.
Since it will cover one of the core logic of ZK it will helpful to
Hi Henry,
I just commented on the Jira. I would be happy to contribute.
Please advise on the current status and next steps. Thanks.
Regards,
-Vishal
Hi Andraz,
I am quite keen to implement this myself. We need this for our project as
well. Your environment certainly seems more dynamic.
Unfortunately, I haven't been able to find time for implementing this yet
due to some immediate project deadlines. While I won't be able to work on
this
Hi Patrick,
Will this be hosted over web? Thanks.
-Vishal
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
There's now a meetup entry for anyone interested in attending the ZooKeeper
contributors meeting happening at Yahoo offices (sunnyvale) the day after
the summit.
I might be wrong here, but let me try to chip in my few cents.
I think the problem is in LearnerHandler.java at the leader fo this
Follower.
/* see what other packets from the proposal
* and tobeapplied queues need to be sent
* and then decide if we can just
Nevermind. I am on the wrong track. Flavio's earlier mail did clarify that
the follower received the epoch before restart.
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 6:20 PM, Vishal K vishalm...@gmail.com wrote:
I might be wrong here, but let me try to chip in my few cents.
I think the problem
:/0.0.0.0:2181] FATAL
org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.Learner - Leader epoch 7 is less than
our epoch 8
-Vishal
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Vishal K vishalm...@gmail.com wrote:
Nevermind. I am on the wrong track. Flavio's earlier mail did clarify that
the follower received the epoch before
Hi Flavio ,
I got the same error messages. I can reproduce this quite easily. I will
capture the logs again. Is there anything else you would like me to provide?
Thanks.
-Vishal
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Flavio Paiva Junqueira (JIRA)
j...@apache.org wrote:
[
Hi,
What would be the right way to apply a zookeeper patch. For instance, if I
am using zookeeper-3-3.0 and I would like to apply a patch for ZOOKEEPER-790
to this version.
However, I presume that the patch that I have is generate from the trunk. Is
there a way I can get a patch specific to
Hi Patrick, Mahadev,
We would like to apply critical patches asap. For example, this bug was
preventing a failed node to rejoin the cluster. In such cases, it won't be
possible to wait for the next version. What process do you suggest to be
follow in such a case? I am not restricting the
Hi All,
I work for VMware. My company tells me that any contirubtion that I make to
ZK needs to have a line saying Copyright [year of creation - year of last
modification] VMware, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
If portions of a file are modified, then I could identify only those
portions of the file,
can
resolve this issue.
Best,
Henry
On 26 August 2010 14:58, Vishal K vishalm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I work for VMware. My company tells me that any contirubtion that I make
to
ZK needs to have a line saying Copyright [year of creation - year of
last
modification] VMware, Inc
Hi Jared,
I like the idea of allowing communication with ZK on only the IP addresses
specified in the config file. This is useful when you are having a host with
multiple IP address and/or when you want to have traffic isolation. In our
setup, we will use this feature for traffic isolation. We
specified in the server.# should be
used. Advanced configurations can specify 0:0:0:0 to get the current
behavior. This way there wouldn't need to be another option to say that
(which would need customized anyway in such configurations).
~Jared
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Vishal K
), but then the config files of the servers
would still have to be different...
Does that make sense?
Jared
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Vishal K vishalm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jared,
If we keep this optional, then the servers would not need to bind to any
specific interface. We will just use
Hi All,
I had posted this message as a comment for ZOOKEEPER-822. I thought it might
be a good idea to give a wider attention so that it will be easier to
collect feedback.
I found few problems in the FLE implementation while debugging for:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-822.
apprecaited.
Thanks.
-Vishal
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Mahadev Konar maha...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Hi Vishal,
Thanks for picking this up. My comments are inline:
On 9/2/10 3:31 PM, Vishal K vishalm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I had posted this message as a comment
for
real fix. I will send out the diff soon.
I also agree that it would be nice to have the numbers you are requesting.
I would love to see
Thanks,
-Flavio
Thanks.
-Vishal
On Sep 3, 2010, at 8:51 PM, Vishal K wrote:
Hi Mahadev,
To be honest, yes, we need the quick fix. I am really
reappear when A is restarted and successfully rejoins the cluster. (at
least
until the session timeout is exceeded)
Patrick
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Vishal K vishalm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a 3 node ZK cluster (A, B, C). On one of the the nodes (node A), I
have a ZK client
from all servers during the time of the incident? If you could run the
servers in DEBUG level logging during the time you reproduce the issue that
would probably help:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER
Thanks!
Patrick
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Vishal K vishalm
Hi,
I would like to add my few cents here.
I would suggest to stay away from code cleanup unless it is absolutely
necessary.
I would also like to extend this discussion to understand the amount of
testing/QA to be performed before a release. How do we currently qualify a
release?
Recently, we
a plan. You should go ahead and
create a jira for the QA plan. We should all pitch in with what all should
be tested.
Thanks
mahadev
On 10/15/10 7:32 AM, Vishal K vishalm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I would like to add my few cents here.
I would suggest to stay away from code cleanup
the
corner cases of ZooKeeper. I'd expect everyone to pitch in for testing a
release. We should definitely work towards a plan. You should go ahead
and
create a jira for the QA plan. We should all pitch in with what all
should
be tested.
Thanks
mahadev
On 10/15/10 7:32 AM, Vishal K
+1.
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
It's been a few days, any thoughts? Acceptable? I'd like to keep moving the
ball forward. Thanks.
Patrick
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 8:43 PM, 明珠刘 redis...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
2010/10/14 Patrick Hunt
Hi All,
I am thinking about the choices one would have to support multiple 2-node
clusters. Assume that for some reason one needs to support multiple 2-node
clusters.
This would mean they will have to figure out a way to run a third instance
of ZK server for each cluster somewhere to ensure that
gaurantees
between a 2 node and 3 node cluster?
Thanks
mahadev
On 10/25/10 1:05 PM, Vishal K vishalm...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I am thinking about the choices one would have to support multiple 2-node
clusters. Assume that for some reason one needs to support multiple
2-node
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-734?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vishal K updated ZOOKEEPER-734:
---
Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-734.patch
Request for review.
There is probably a better way to handle
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12863359#action_12863359
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-107:
Hi Henry,
We are using ZK for one the projects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12879520#action_12879520
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-335:
Hi,
We are running into this bug very often
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vishal K updated ZOOKEEPER-335:
---
Attachment: zklogs.tar.gz
Hi,
I have attached the logs. The log entries are similar to those
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12881028#action_12881028
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-335:
Hi,
I enabled tracing and did some more
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vishal K updated ZOOKEEPER-335:
---
Attachment: faultynode-vishal.txt
Apologies for multiple attachments.
zookeeper servers should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12881280#action_12881280
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-335:
I will try out the patch. FYI I am using 3.3.0
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12881282#action_12881282
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-790:
I will try out the patch. I will try it out
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12887941#action_12887941
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-790:
Folks,
Sorry to the delay. The patch did
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12888119#action_12888119
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-790:
copying comments from email to jira.
Hi Flavio
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12888121#action_12888121
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-790:
copying comments from email to jira.
I forgot
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12888122#action_12888122
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-790:
From ZOOKEEPER-335..
Hi,
I enabled tracing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12888330#action_12888330
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-790:
Hi Flavio,
I am going to retry again
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12888443#action_12888443
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-790:
Hi Patrick,
I had done that earlier. I will do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=1243#action_1243
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-790:
Likewise.
Last processed zxid set prematurely
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12889225#action_12889225
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-790:
great! I will give it a try. Thanks.
Last
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vishal K updated ZOOKEEPER-822:
---
Attachment: test_zookeeper_2.log
test_zookeeper_1.log
Attaching logs from two
Affects Versions: 3.3.0
Reporter: Vishal K
Priority: Blocker
Created a 3 node cluster.
1 Fail the ZK leader
2. Let leader election finish. Restart the leader and let it join the
3. Repeat
After a few rounds leader election takes anywhere 25- 60 seconds to finish.
Note
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12889902#action_12889902
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-822:
I would like that add that the problem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12890052#action_12890052
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-822:
Hi Flavio,
I have Zookeeper servers running
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vishal K updated ZOOKEEPER-822:
---
Attachment: zk_leader_election.tar.gz
Hi Flavio,
I have attached the logs. Hope this helps. Do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-790?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12893776#action_12893776
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-790:
Hi,
I tested the patch and it works really
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vishal K updated ZOOKEEPER-822:
---
Attachment: 822.tar.gz
attaching new logs.
Leader election taking a long time to complete
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12896061#action_12896061
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-822:
Hi Ivan.
Were the logs of any help? I might
ZK lets any node to become an observer
--
Key: ZOOKEEPER-851
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-851
Project: Zookeeper
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Vishal K
Fix
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12899156#action_12899156
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-822:
Hi Ivan,
Can you describe me your setup?
My
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12899983#action_12899983
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-822:
While going through the code yesterday, I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12900108#action_12900108
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-822:
I am suspecting that one of the node
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12900111#action_12900111
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-822:
at line 852 in 10.17.119.101-zookeeper.log
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12900401#action_12900401
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-822:
Hi Flavio,
Ah! my trunk is quite old
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vishal K updated ZOOKEEPER-822:
---
Attachment: zookeeper-3.4.0.tar.gz
Hi,
To rule out any setup specific issues (VM/ESX/ect), I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12900898#action_12900898
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-822:
Correction:
2. SendWorker.run() calls finish
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12902988#action_12902988
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-822:
The fix for problem 1 and 2 above eliminates
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12905528#action_12905528
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-822:
Hi Flavio,
I was planning to send out a mail
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vishal K updated ZOOKEEPER-822:
---
Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-822.patch_v1
Hi,
I have attached the diff of my changes. It is a pretty
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12909556#action_12909556
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-822:
Hi Flavio,
As I mentioned earlier
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12909560#action_12909560
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-822:
I agree with Mahadev.
Leader election taking
Small fixes to PurgeTxnLog
---
Key: ZOOKEEPER-872
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-872
Project: Zookeeper
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 3.3.1
Reporter: Vishal K
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vishal K updated ZOOKEEPER-872:
---
Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-872
patch attached.
Small fixes to PurgeTxnLog
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12909564#action_12909564
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-872:
Is there any reason why we dont have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12912483#action_12912483
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-822:
Hi Flavio,
Thanks. I will take a look
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-822?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12913307#action_12913307
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-822:
Hi Flavio,
+1. Looks good. I remember looking
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12917685#action_12917685
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-880:
While debugging for https://issues.apache.org
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-851?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12921340#action_12921340
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-851:
Hi Henry ,
Any comments?
Thanks.
-Vishal
ZK
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12921360#action_12921360
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-445:
Is this a bug? If not, we should just close
: Bug
Reporter: Vishal K
Assignee: Flavio Junqueira
Priority: Critical
From earlier email exchanges:
1. Blocking connects and accepts:
a) The first problem is in manager.toSend(). This invokes connectOne(), which
does a blocking connect. While testing, I changed
Reporter: Vishal K
The sync request does not set the session owner in Request.
As a result, the leader keeps printing:
2010-07-01 10:55:36,733 - INFO [ProcessThread:-1:preprequestproces...@405] -
Got user-level KeeperException when processing sessionid:0x298d3b1fa9
type:sync
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vishal K updated ZOOKEEPER-907:
---
Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-907.patch
attaching patch.
Spurious KeeperErrorCode = Session moved
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12923107#action_12923107
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-907:
sure, I will write a test.
What do you think
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12923627#action_12923627
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-907:
Ben,
What do you mean by partial sync
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12924200#action_12924200
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-907:
Let the client connect to the follower. Make
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vishal K updated ZOOKEEPER-907:
---
Attachment: ZOOKEEPER-907.patch_v2
Attaching cleaned-up patch.
Ben, let me know what you think
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12925512#action_12925512
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-907:
Which return code are you referring to? You
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12925541#action_12925541
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-907:
It did occur to me. I thought
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-851?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12925997#action_12925997
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-851:
I have not used observers yet. Looks like
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12926343#action_12926343
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-914:
Hi Pat, Flavio,
I will begin with admitting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12927127#action_12927127
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-872:
Hi Pat,
The current code prints to stdout. We
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12928590#action_12928590
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-900:
Hi Flavio,
Thanks for your feedback. I will do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12928605#action_12928605
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-917:
Hi Flavio,
Sorry for not making much progress
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12929589#action_12929589
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-914:
Hi Flavio,
You are right. Sorry, my comment
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12929602#action_12929602
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-917:
Hi Flavio,
Thanks for the clarification
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12929681#action_12929681
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-914:
Hi Flavio,
The documentation is not clear
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-914?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12929724#action_12929724
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-914:
OK, that didn't make sense. My comment about
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-917?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12930169#action_12930169
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-917:
Hi Flavio,
Lets see if I understand this right
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12930272#action_12930272
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-900:
Hi Mahadev,
Yes, I will provide a patch
Project: Zookeeper
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 3.3.2
Reporter: Vishal K
Fix For: 3.4.0
In Follower.followLeader() after syncing with the leader, the follower does:
while (self.isRunning()) {
readPacket(qp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-928?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12930780#action_12930780
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-928:
Hi Flavio,
I was aware of that. However
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-928?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12930786#action_12930786
]
Vishal K commented on ZOOKEEPER-928:
ok, I see your point. I mis-analyzed this part
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
