Agreed. ZooKeeper is very useful as part of the Hadoop project (which I don't
use myself :-)
Don't fix it !
Op 22 mrt 2010, om 19:32 heeft Patrick Hunt het volgende geschreven:
> You have probably heard by now that there is a discussion going on in
> the Hadoop PMC as to whether a number of the
The tl;dr version of the below is that I'm keen for ZooKeeper to become a
TLP in the future, but it's not (yet) clear that now is the right time.
1. Is there any way in which the current structure practically hinders
ZooKeeper's active development? One concern that has been raised elsewhere
is tha
I agree with Ben here.
I think we do need sometime to get more bodies contributing to the ZooKeeper
codebase. Being a subproject of Hadoop gives us quite a few benefits like
branding/discoverability (as Pat mentioned). These benefits are important to
us given our small developer base and the limite
It is difficult for me to make up my mind as I feel I don't have
enough information to decide. Right now it feels that there is no
concrete major benefit to move to TLP status. My impression is that
the Hadoop PMC has represented us well and helped us all along, so I
believe our position is
pat, i think you articulated well the problems with becoming a TLP. you
don't seem to have voted for one of the options though :)
i guess my view corresponds to option 2). it does seem like a good idea
in the long term for ZooKeeper to become its own project, but for the
near term, for the rea
You have probably heard by now that there is a discussion going on in
the Hadoop PMC as to whether a number of the subprojects (Hbase, Avro,
Zookeeper, Hive, and Pig) should move out from under the Hadoop
umbrella and become top level Apache projects (TLP). This discussion
has picked up recently s
