Hi,
There is foreign code in the release tar ball, which is not attributed
to in the top-level LICENSE/NOTICE file.
see for example
src/c/configure
So I guess it is not safe to release this as-is.
It would be nice if the release artifacts would be named
apache-zookeeper...
but this more my pe
apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/trunk/NOTICE.txt
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/server/trunk/NOTICE.txt
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/hbase/trunk/NOTICE.txt
and probably many, many others
Bernd
PS: I don't think it is particulary nice to close a vote when there
are ongo
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 19:10, Owen O'Malley wrote:
>
> Bernd Fondermann wrote:
>
> I'm not saying that the license is incompatible, I am saying that you
>
> need to record third party contributions in the NOTICE file.
>
> The critical reference is:
> http:/
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 18:12, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> Bernd Fondermann wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 18:25, Patrick Hunt wrote:
>>>
>>> The configure script is free license (it's in the header of the file).
>>> IANAL
>>> but based on my
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 20:43, Patrick Hunt wrote:
> Bernd Fondermann wrote:
>>
>> Well, I'm not guessing any more than you do. :-)
>
> :-)
>
>> I didn't -1, because I've no binding vote anyway on this PMC.
>> I just checked out the release and ga
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12752909#action_12752909
]
Bernd Fondermann commented on ZOOKEEPER-521:
+1, since all involved f
