On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 20:43, Patrick Hunt<ph...@apache.org> wrote: > Bernd Fondermann wrote: >> >> Well, I'm not guessing any more than you do. :-) > > :-) > >> I didn't -1, because I've no binding vote anyway on this PMC. >> I just checked out the release and gave feedback, whether it's >> appreciated or not I'm not quite sure. > > We take all serious votes seriously. > >> Imperative to whom? >> >> Hurrying a release never serves well. Votes at Apache should run for >> at least 72 hrs. It's also convenient to give a timezone and time when >> the vote ends, because EOD might be at different times for different >> people. >> If this is a security fix, however, I think a shorter timeframe is ok. >> But it is not labelled as such. > > There is no hurry here. The vote started when my initial email was sent - > specifically "08/28/2009 11:21 AM" and closed on "09/03/2009 03:36 PM", > which is greater than the requisite 72 hrs. You make a good point however, I > will include timezone in subsequent emails.
I couldn't make out when the release vote had been started. Looks like a great release then. Thanks for bearing with me, Bernd