On 16/12/2009 19:15, Patrick Hunt wrote:
Rt, this was with 1gE. No, I don't know anyone who has done this. But
it should be easy enough for you to test. Limit the amount of data you
are storing in znodes and it shouldn't be too terrible.
Ok. I will do experiments in a lab with 40 Core 2 duo ma
On 16/12/2009 20:06, Benjamin Reed wrote:
I agree with Ted, it doesn't seem like a good idea to do in practice.
Maybe in some specifically environment as described in ZOOKEEPER-546.
But yes, I agree, it's only a idea. The world are changing to SSD's too!
1) use tmpfs
My memory will be sp
ZK does a good enough job at avoiding seeks that if you give it some
dedicated disks, you may not see much speedup with SSD's.
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Thiago Borges wrote:
> Maybe in some specifically environment as described in ZOOKEEPER-546. But
> yes, I agree, it's only a idea. The w
If you do test large (and by large I'm talking about millions of znodes
and 10s of millions of watches) be sure to allocate enough memory, get
the latest JVM (1.6.0_17) and turn on incremental/CMS GC in the sun JVM.
You may find this helpful as well for tracking progress in real time:
http://b