-
From: Benjamin Reed [mailto:br...@yahoo-inc.com]
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 11:12 AM
To: zookeeper-user@hadoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: Testing zookeeper outside the source distribution?
we should be exposing those classes and releasing them as a testing
jar. do you want to open up a jira to
You might checkout a tool I built a while back to be used by operations
teams deploying ZooKeeper: http://bit.ly/a6tGVJ
It's really two tools actually, a smoketester and a latency tester, both of
which are important to verify when deploying a new cluster.
Patrick
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 9:50 AM,
You might checkout a tool I built a while back to be used by operations
teams deploying ZooKeeper: http://bit.ly/a6tGVJ
It's really two tools actually, a smoketester and a latency tester, both of
which are important to verify when deploying a new cluster.
Patrick
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 9:50 AM,
Generally, I think a better way to do this is to use a standard mock object
framework. Then you don't have to fake up an interface.
But the original poster probably has a need to do integration tests more
than unit tests. In such tests, they need to test against a real ZK to make
sure that their
On 10/18/2010 08:17 AM, Anthony Urso wrote:
Anyone have any pointers on how to test against ZK outside of the
source distribution? All the fun classes (e.g. ClientBase) do not make
it into the ZK release jar.
Right now I am manually running a ZK node for the unit tests to
connect to prior to run
we should be exposing those classes and releasing them as a testing
jar. do you want to open up a jira to track this issue?
ben
On 10/18/2010 05:17 AM, Anthony Urso wrote:
Anyone have any pointers on how to test against ZK outside of the
source distribution? All the fun classes (e.g. ClientBa
Anyone have any pointers on how to test against ZK outside of the
source distribution? All the fun classes (e.g. ClientBase) do not make
it into the ZK release jar.
Right now I am manually running a ZK node for the unit tests to
connect to prior to running my test, but I would rather have somethin
