Hi, I am trying to become familiar with the zookeeper API and am seeing
the following exceptions when attempting to create a node; any pointers
as to where to look for their cause would be greatly appreciated.
AFAIK, I am not doing anything special. I am running ZK standalone
using JDK 1.6 and
Forgot to mention, I am using the zookeeper-2.2.0.jar distribution.
Juan Ramirez wrote:
> Hi, I am trying to become familiar with the zookeeper API and am seeing
> the following exceptions when attempting to create a node; any pointers
> as to where to look for their cause would b
com.yahoo.zookeeper.ClientCnxn$SendThread.readConnectResult(ClientCnxn.java:400)
at
com.yahoo.zookeeper.ClientCnxn$SendThread.doIO(ClientCnxn.java:492)
at
com.yahoo.zookeeper.ClientCnxn$SendThread.run(ClientCnxn.java:705)
Juan Ramirez wrote:
> Forgot to mention, I am using the zookeeper-2.
Hi, Ben. Thanks for the prompt reply.
Benjamin Reed wrote:
> Usually, this exception means that the server closed the socket. Are you
> seeing anything strange in the server log?
>
It seems like the server is expiring the session; not sure why.
2008-05-23 14:26:08,354 - WARN [NIOServerCxn.Fa
]
Juan Ramirez wrote:
> Hi, Ben. Thanks for the prompt reply.
>
> Benjamin Reed wrote:
>> Usually, this exception means that the server closed the socket. Are you
>> seeing anything strange in the server log?
>>
>
> It seems like the server is expiring the sessi
Mahadev Konar wrote:
> Hi Juan,
> Can you tell us what you are doing in your client code and when you
> see this problem?
Hi, Mahadev. It seems to happen when attempting to create a new node.
Might be a timing issue because it does not happen all the time. The
client code where this happens
A piece of info I left out which appears to be relevant is that I was
running the standalone server and its client on the same machine.
Perhaps this is not supported? I am not seeing the problem in a
clustered deployment with 5 zookeeper instances.
Thanks,
Juan
Juan Ramirez wrote:
> Maha
s,
Juan
>
> ben
>
> On Friday 23 May 2008 13:00:02 Juan Ramirez wrote:
>> A piece of info I left out which appears to be relevant is that I was
>> running the standalone server and its client on the same machine.
>> Perhaps this is not supported? I am not seeing
