On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 08:26, Fabio Tranchitella kob...@kobold.it wrote:
I've tested the whole ZTK KGS using the current zope.testing's trunk and
the only failing package was zope.minmax (already fixed in the trunk),
because it imported zope.testing and used zope.testing.doctest, which fails
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Wed Dec 23 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Thu Dec 24 12:00:00 2009 UTC.
There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Wed Dec 23 20:37:04 EST 2009
URL:
* 2009-12-24 11:40, Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 08:26, Fabio Tranchitella kob...@kobold.it wrote:
I've tested the whole ZTK KGS using the current zope.testing's trunk and
the only failing package was zope.minmax (already fixed in the trunk),
because it imported
On Dec 24, 2009, at 8:50 AM, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
I don't think we can avoid the error, and to be honest I consider the code in
zope.minmax to be wrong.
import zope.testing
x = zope.testing.doctest.DocTestFile(...
The import is wrong, it should be zope.testing.doctest, and I
On Dec 24, 2009, at 10:13 AM, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
* 2009-12-24 15:43, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
You did not import zope.testing.doctest, but the reference to it remains.
I don't think that's a fix.
You are right, I committed the right fix.
I was just about to commit the same thing +
* 2009-12-24 16:20, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
Before I release the egg on PyPI:
1. Should we release as 1.1.2 (a minor change), or
2. Does the removal of dependency on zope.testing warrants a
bump to 1.2.0?
I think 1.1.2 is okey, you are not changing any behaviour of
On Dec 24, 2009, at 10:26 AM, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
* 2009-12-24 16:20, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
Before I release the egg on PyPI:
1. Should we release as 1.1.2 (a minor change), or
2. Does the removal of dependency on zope.testing warrants a
bump to 1.2.0?
I
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Zvezdan Petkovic zvez...@zope.com wrote:
Of course, it may be worth trying if there is a critical mass of supporters.
Alternately, there could be a way of extending the standard doctest to
achieve this feature without pushing it into the standard library.
I'm
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Zvezdan Petkovic zvez...@zope.com wrote:
On Dec 24, 2009, at 10:26 AM, Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
* 2009-12-24 16:20, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
...
FWIW, I preferred zope.testing.doctest reporting of 15 tests because
that's the actual number of things being
Running easy_install -i http://download.zope.org/Zope2/index/2.12.2 Zope2 in
a virtualenv w/o site packages failed on the following dependency. It of
course was easy to easy_install docutils and finish the install
successfully.
Thanks,
- Jim
Installed
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 14:50, Fabio Tranchitella kob...@kobold.it wrote:
I don't think we can avoid the error, and to be honest I consider the code
in zope.minmax to be wrong.
import zope.testing
x = zope.testing.doctest.DocTestFile(...
The import is wrong
No, that's perferctly
* 2009-12-25 07:32, Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 14:50, Fabio Tranchitella kob...@kobold.it wrote:
I don't think we can avoid the error, and to be honest I consider the code
in zope.minmax to be wrong.
import zope.testing
x = zope.testing.doctest.DocTestFile(...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Pharis wrote:
Running easy_install -i
http://download.zope.org/Zope2/index/2.12.2 Zope2 in a virtualenv
w/o site packages failed on the following dependency. It of course
was easy to easy_install docutils and finish the install
successfully.
I'm trying to wrap my head around what the changes in Zope2.12 can mean for
how I develop in Zope2 now. I've developed things in Zope3 and am getting
stuck attempting the same methods in Zope2.12. So I see now that etc/ now
has a site.zcml. But what is missing is the package-includes directory
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Pharis wrote:
I'm trying to wrap my head around what the changes in Zope2.12 can
mean for how I develop in Zope2 now. I've developed things in
Zope3 and am getting stuck attempting the same methods in Zope2.12.
So I see now that etc/ now has a
Perhaps I'm misunderstanding the implications of basing Zope2.12 on ZTK
eggs. I was under the impression it would allow sites to be developed in a
similar way to how its done in Zope3, ie placing your site in
instance/lib/python/site and wiring it all together using the site.zcml
now present in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Pharis wrote:
Perhaps I'm misunderstanding the implications of basing Zope2.12
on ZTK eggs. I was under the impression it would allow sites to be
developed in a similar way to how its done in Zope3, ie placing
your site in
17 matches
Mail list logo
