Hi,
I am trying to upgrade an old 2.10 instance to 2.13, and I appear to
be having trouble with the Psycopg connection and ZSQL methods. First
of all, it took some work to uncover that I had to download the source
code for Psycopg in order to get the ZPsycopgDA zope product
(easy_install
:
On 09/02/2011 11:12 PM, Michael Shulman wrote:
Second, it took some
more work to uncover that I had to separately install the ZSQLMethods
product.
Michael, I can't help you with your issue but I got stuck in the upgrade
since I didn't manage to install the ZSQLMethods. Can you tell which
I wrote:
I just noticed that when I submit a form to a zope script(python) that
includes a file upload, the content-type and content-length headers of
the response are incorrectly set to those of the uploaded file, rather
than those of what the script actually returns. Any ideas why this
I just noticed that when I submit a form to a zope script(python) that
includes a file upload, the content-type and content-length headers of
the response are incorrectly set to those of the uploaded file, rather
than those of what the script actually returns. Any ideas why this
could be
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just noticed that when I submit a form to a zope script(python) that
includes a file upload, the content-type and content-length headers of
the response are incorrectly set to those of the uploaded file, rather
Robert (Jamie) Munro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd much rather have a dictionary of fields and values, and just throw
it at the DB, not having to make those queries for every table. I have
acheived it like so:
I have achieved a similar result, although for update methods in my
case, in what I
Am I correct that zope's item.subitem:record facility for form
submission does not extend to nesting such things? If I have a form
of the sort:
input name=item.subitem.subsubitem:record
I would like it to show up in the request as a record 'item' with an
element named 'subitem' that is itself a
I don't *think* that page answers my question... if it does, can you
point me to where?
On 3/11/06, Jonathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have a look at:
http://www.zope.org/Members/Zen/howto/FormVariableTypes
Jonathan
- Original Message -
From: Michael Shulman [EMAIL PROTECTED
I don't understand what inheriting proxy roles from callers has to do
with allowing users to access protected resources above their user
folders. They seem like totally different questions to me. Could you
please explain?
On 2/16/06, Tres Seaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But... it's still not
On 2/16/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only change I recall to how proxy roles work is that proxy roles
used to *augment* a users' roles; now they *replace* them.
I don't know that the case you are talking about (S1 has proxy roles,
calls protected S2 fine, but fails when
On 2/15/06, Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But... it's still not working for my real site. I think the issue is
this. If script1 has proxy role Manager, and script2 has view
permissions set only for Manager, then script1 can call script2, no
problem. But if script1 instead calls
*also* has proxy role Manager.
Is there a way to make scripts inherit proxy roles from their
callers? Or am I confused once again?
mike
On 2/14/06, Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Shulman wrote:
Thanks Lennart! Proxy roles do sound like the answer, but I cannot
get them
Hi,
I am new to Zope, and so far I like it very much. But I think I am
confused about how security works, or is supposed to work.
Specifically I want to know the following.
Is there a way in Zope to restrict permissions for direct access only
(i.e. calling an object through the web) but still
13 matches
Mail list logo
