Re: [Zope] Re: restricting permissions for direct access only

2006-02-17 Thread Chris Withers
Michael Shulman wrote: I don't understand what inheriting proxy roles from callers has to do with allowing users to access protected resources above their user folders. They seem like totally different questions to me. Could you please explain? Nothing, different threads, crossed wires, nothi

[Zope] Re: restricting permissions for direct access only

2006-02-16 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chris Withers wrote: > Tres Seaver wrote: > >> The prior behavior (allowing users to access protected resources "above" >> the domain of their user folders) was a security hole caused by a bug, >> and was never documented as allowable: correcting it

[Zope] Re: restricting permissions for direct access only

2006-02-16 Thread Michael Shulman
I don't understand what inheriting proxy roles from callers has to do with allowing users to access protected resources above their user folders. They seem like totally different questions to me. Could you please explain? On 2/16/06, Tres Seaver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>But... it's still

Re: [Zope] Re: restricting permissions for direct access only

2006-02-16 Thread Chris Withers
David wrote: I just disagree. If theres a paranoia with the standard set of roles then prevent *those* from upward acquisition. But if I add a role *specifically* so it can access a common code pool, Security is hard enough as it is, special cases like this are something that Zoep 2 has en

Re: [Zope] Re: restricting permissions for direct access only

2006-02-16 Thread Chris Withers
Tres Seaver wrote: The prior behavior (allowing users to access protected resources "above" the domain of their user folders) was a security hole caused by a bug, and was never documented as allowable: correcting it was a matter for a rather urgent fix, as it broke the explicitly-documented mode

Re: [Zope] Re: restricting permissions for direct access only

2006-02-15 Thread David
Tres Seaver wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michael Shulman wrote: On 2/15/06, Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: But... it's still not working for my real site. I think the issue is this. If script1 has proxy role Manager, an

[Zope] Re: restricting permissions for direct access only

2006-02-15 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michael Shulman wrote: > On 2/15/06, Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>But... it's still not working for my real site. I think the issue is >>>this. If script1 has proxy role Manager, and script2 has view >>>permissions set only for Mana

[Zope] Re: restricting permissions for direct access only

2006-02-14 Thread Florent Guillaume
Michael Shulman wrote: Hi, I am new to Zope, and so far I like it very much. But I think I am confused about how security works, or is supposed to work. Specifically I want to know the following. Is there a way in Zope to restrict permissions for direct access only (i.e. calling an object thro