Re: [Zope] XUF and Postgres

David Pratt wrote: for this feedback. I will be evaluating this option as well. There are differences in licensing that may be a factor in what I decide to use after some evaluation. BSD with XUF compared to MIT with SimpleUserFolder. Huh?! What exactly is the problems with the MIT

Re: [Zope] XUF and Postgres

Hi Garth. Yes, it is very compact compared to XUF for sure. Thank you for this feedback. I will be evaluating this option as well. There are differences in licensing that may be a factor in what I decide to use after some evaluation. BSD with XUF compared to MIT with SimpleUserFolder. I

Re: [Zope] XUF and Postgres

Am Donnerstag, den 14.07.2005, 12:46 -0300 schrieb David Pratt: I am looking at using the ExUserFolder with Postgres. Any users of this combination that could share feedback (positive or negative) on how this solution is working for them. Many thanks. I use it but in a very hacked up form

Re: [Zope] XUF and Postgres

+---[ Tino Wildenhain ]-- | Am Donnerstag, den 14.07.2005, 12:46 -0300 schrieb David Pratt: | I am looking at using the ExUserFolder with Postgres. Any users of | this combination that could share feedback (positive or negative) on | how this solution is working for

Re: [Zope] XUF and Postgres

Am Freitag, den 15.07.2005, 16:25 +1000 schrieb Andrew Milton: +---[ Tino Wildenhain ]-- | Am Donnerstag, den 14.07.2005, 12:46 -0300 schrieb David Pratt: | I am looking at using the ExUserFolder with Postgres. Any users of | this combination that could share

Re: [Zope] XUF and Postgres

Thanks Tino and Andrew. This is all useful feedback. Regards, David On Friday, July 15, 2005, at 05:11 AM, Tino Wildenhain wrote: Am Freitag, den 15.07.2005, 16:25 +1000 schrieb Andrew Milton: +---[ Tino Wildenhain ]-- | Am Donnerstag, den 14.07.2005, 12:46 -0300

Re: [Zope] XUF and Postgres

David Pratt wrote: I am looking at using the ExUserFolder with Postgres. Any users of this combination that could share feedback (positive or negative) on how this solution is working for them. Many thanks. You might want to take a look at SimpleUserFolder. It's a lot more light weight that

Re: [Zope] XUF and Postgres

David Pratt wrote at 2005-7-14 20:30 -0300: Thanks Dieter. I was really hoping it is a good solution since it is the only User Folder product for Postgres that I have seen thus far. Chris Withers would tell you, that Simple User Folder can do this as well :-) -- Dieter

Re: [Zope] XUF and Postgres

For what it's worth, I recently used the SimpleUserFolder for an application that uses Postgres as the backend. It was terrifically easy to implement authentication through Postgres via the SimpleUserFolder. It does exactly what I want without unnecessary frill or complications. Garth On

Re: [Zope] XUF and Postgres

David Pratt wrote at 2005-7-14 12:46 -0300: I am looking at using the ExUserFolder with Postgres. Any users of this combination that could share feedback (positive or negative) on how this solution is working for them. We use it and are satisfied with it. -- Dieter

Re: [Zope] XUF and Postgres

Thanks Dieter. I was really hoping it is a good solution since it is the only User Folder product for Postgres that I have seen thus far. Regards David On Thursday, July 14, 2005, at 06:49 PM, Dieter Maurer wrote: David Pratt wrote at 2005-7-14 12:46 -0300: I am looking at using the