On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 01:28, Jim Pharis binbr...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to wrap my head around what the changes in Zope2.12 can mean for
how I develop in Zope2 now. I've developed things in Zope3 and am getting
stuck attempting the same methods in Zope2.12. So I see now that etc/ now
What's my use case for developing Zope3ish/ZTKish in Zope2 instead of just
using Zope3? All the preceived benefits of Zope3 now available in Zope2 well
still being able to use all our Zope 2 Products. I thought basing Zope2.12
on ZTK bridged the 2 worlds.
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 2:10 AM, Andreas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Pharis wrote:
What's my use case for developing Zope3ish/ZTKish in Zope2 instead
of just using Zope3? All the preceived benefits of Zope3 now
available in Zope2 well still being able to use all our Zope 2
Products. I thought basing Zope2.12 on
So the line you reference in site.zcml is the same for me, and it says look
in package-includes/*-configure.zcml. That child dir wasn't actually created
though so theres nothing in it.
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 4:47 AM, Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 01:28, Jim
So developing in Z3 had several perceived benefits no? The problem is that
in many cases existing projects couldn't just move to Z3 and start using the
CA. From Z3 development was born ZTK, a modular CA implementation that Z2
could now leverage, and I thought in theory all the Z3 CA goodness was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Pharis wrote:
I want to start developing new stuff using CA paradigms in Z2.
So *why* Zope 2?
The ZTK/Zope 3 modules provide a much cleaner
basis for new projects than the Zope 2 app-server. So what is
in Zope 3/ZTK missing? Why do you need
I have several existing Z2 Products that aren't going anywhere. I still need
these. I can't just move to Z3 and leave our existing Z2 Products behind.
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 6:40 AM, Andreas Jung li...@zopyx.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Pharis wrote:
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Pharis wrote:
I have several existing Z2 Products that aren't going anywhere. I still need
these. I can't just move to Z3 and leave our existing Z2 Products behind.
There seems to be a misunderstanding what the ZTK is and what it isn't.
The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
Jim Pharis wrote:
I have several existing Z2 Products that aren't going anywhere.
I
still need
these. I can't just move to Z3 and leave our existing Z2
Products
behind.
There seems to be a misunderstanding what the ZTK
Yes, I'm running into missing bits in various places. So even though Z2.12
is based on ZTK eggs, and ZTK eggs are designed using all the CA goodness, I
still can't easily develop using those methods. So I'm left leaving this
conversation thinking that I'm back to developing Products using the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Pharis wrote:
Yes, I'm running into missing bits in various places. So even
though Z2.12 is based on ZTK eggs, and ZTK eggs are designed using
all the CA goodness, I still can't easily develop using those
methods. So I'm left leaving this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Pharis wrote:
Yes, I'm running into missing bits in various places. So even though Z2.12
is based on ZTK eggs, and ZTK eggs are designed using all the CA goodness, I
still can't easily develop using those methods. So I'm left leaving this
So far I had just tried developing a site and allow it to be Added and
Viewed in the ZMI.
In the Z2.12 instance/etc/site.zcml I have...
include package=Test/
In the browser dir I put a configure.zcml.
browser:containerViews
for=Test.interfaces.INewTestSite
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Pharis wrote:
browser:containerViews
for=Test.interfaces.INewTestSite
contents=zope.ManageContent
index=zope.View
add=zope.ManageContent
/
ZopeXMLConfigurationError: File
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 11:47, Jim Pharis binbr...@gmail.com wrote:
What's my use case for developing Zope3ish/ZTKish in Zope2 instead of just
using Zope3? All the preceived benefits of Zope3 now available in Zope2 well
still being able to use all our Zope 2 Products. I thought basing Zope2.12
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 11:53, Jim Pharis binbr...@gmail.com wrote:
So the line you reference in site.zcml is the same for me, and it says look
in package-includes/*-configure.zcml. That child dir wasn't actually created
though so theres nothing in it.
That's correct. But your question was
I know of Five but I must admit I'm not that well acquainted with it. On the
contrary, I was under the impression that Five was going to be falling out
of usefulness as ZTK was being integrated in Z2. Thanks for clearing this up
for me.
On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Lennart Regebro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Pharis wrote:
Yes, I'm running into missing bits in various places. So even though Z2.12
is based on ZTK eggs, and ZTK eggs are designed using all the CA goodness, I
still can't easily develop using those methods.
Going on Five years now, I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Pharis wrote:
I'm trying to wrap my head around what the changes in Zope2.12 can
mean for how I develop in Zope2 now. I've developed things in
Zope3 and am getting stuck attempting the same methods in Zope2.12.
So I see now that etc/ now has a
Perhaps I'm misunderstanding the implications of basing Zope2.12 on ZTK
eggs. I was under the impression it would allow sites to be developed in a
similar way to how its done in Zope3, ie placing your site in
instance/lib/python/site and wiring it all together using the site.zcml
now present in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jim Pharis wrote:
Perhaps I'm misunderstanding the implications of basing Zope2.12
on ZTK eggs. I was under the impression it would allow sites to be
developed in a similar way to how its done in Zope3, ie placing
your site in
21 matches
Mail list logo