[Zope] Request time grows with memory size

2009-04-26 Thread Gerhard Schmidt
HI, I've encounters a performance Problem with Zope. Some requests take very long time to process while others are served very fast. All request go for the URL. The time for the delayed Requests grows with the memory size of the Zope Process. It's direct proportional. I have generated a chart sho

Re: [Zope] Fwd: Building a fast, scalable yet small Zope application

2009-04-26 Thread Patrick Gerken
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 19:45, Tres Seaver wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Patrick Gerken wrote: > >> Argl, why does this mailing list not use the reply-to: field? > > That would be a "religious" question, and one which is not helpful to > debate here..  E.g., see: > >

Re: [Zope] Fwd: Building a fast, scalable yet small Zope application

2009-04-26 Thread Garito
jajajajajajajajajajajajaja Amazing! I don't know how the other list doesn't collapse using reply-to field jajajajajajajajajajajajaja What wonders me more is how belligerent some in this list are with this question You cause the problem, at least try to don't threaten us with ban us if we send y

Re: [Zope] Fwd: Building a fast, scalable yet small Zope application

2009-04-26 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Patrick Gerken wrote: > Argl, why does this mailing list not use the reply-to: field? That would be a "religious" question, and one which is not helpful to debate here.. E.g., see: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html The Zope mailing l

Re: [Zope] Building a fast, scalable yet small Zope application

2009-04-26 Thread Lennart Regebro
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 13:24, Morten W. Petersen wrote: > So far, I've been contemplating disabling undo (if that's possible), I doubt that it would make a difference. The Undo functionality comes out of the database being logging, and changing that would mean pretty much a complete rewrite. >