Bill Anderson wrote:
>
> Yeah, that typo really caught me a good laugh too. I should thank Chris
> for it. :)
Just stick it on the Zope Quotes board, can't remember the URL though :-S
Jeez, what have I done, I wholeheartedly apologise for even mentioning licenses.
Any heard of the web app serve
Andrew Kenneth Milton wrote:
> +---[ Bill Anderson ]--
> | Fabrice FRANK wrote:
> |
> | > I really agree, do NOT change the license terms.
> | >
> | >
> |
> | Ummm .. the software in questions has _no_ license terms yet.
>
> You stifling the right of the individual t
Dario Lopez-Kästen wrote:
> I believe the Horse of Licenses was beaten to death in a recent thread some
> month(s), if not weeks, ago. May It Rest in Peace.
>
> This may be the Second Coming of It, but, with all due respect, License
> Horses and discussions of Other License's Merits and Flaws ar
+---[ Bill Anderson ]--
| Fabrice FRANK wrote:
|
| > I really agree, do NOT change the license terms.
| >
| >
|
| Ummm .. the software in questions has _no_ license terms yet.
You stifling the right of the individual to license-free software Bill? huh?
huh? Well ar
I believe the Horse of Licenses was beaten to death in a recent thread some
month(s), if not weeks, ago. May It Rest in Peace.
This may be the Second Coming of It, but, with all due respect, License
Horses and discussions of Other License's Merits and Flaws are off-topic for
this list; I think mo
Fabrice FRANK wrote:
> I really agree, do NOT change the license terms.
>
>
Ummm .. the software in questions has _no_ license terms yet.
Bill
___
Zope maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
** No cross p
Andreas Heckel wrote:
>> EVERYTHING SNIPED!
>
> PLEASE allow ME to choose the license freely and PLEASE STOP the
> flamewar on this thread!
> You can find tons of these licence discussions not only on this list and
> there is nothing new to say.
Come on people, this is not a flme war. Nobody is
> EVERYTHING SNIPED!
PLEASE allow ME to choose the license freely and PLEASE STOP the
flamewar on this thread!
You can find tons of these licence discussions not only on this list and
there is nothing new to say.
--
Andreas
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Chris Withers wrote:
> And the reason I asked is 'cos, as I understand it, if I use a GPL-licensed
> product in a product/solution I provide, then I have to do that for free and
> open source it too, which often isn't an option :-(
Of course you DON'T have to do your work fo
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 12:58:35PM +, Chris Withers wrote:
> And the reason I asked is 'cos, as I understand it, if I use a GPL-licensed
> product in a product/solution I provide, then I have to do that for free and
> open source it too, which often isn't an option :-(
Nope, that's wrong.
If
OTECTED]]De la part de ender
Envoyé : lundi 29 janvier 2001 06:38
À : Chris Withers; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc : [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Zope Mailinglist
Objet : Re: [Zope] License
On Monday 29 January 2001 01:41, Chris Withers wrote:
> Olaf Zanger wrote:
> > is the product planned to ship under GPL
Chris Withers wrote:
>
> Please don't shit it under GPL, it makes it much less useful :-S
*embarrassed laughs*
Man, what a typo...
I actually meant ship, beleive it or not.
And the reason I asked is 'cos, as I understand it, if I use a GPL-licensed
product in a product/solution I provide, t
On Monday 29 January 2001 01:41, Chris Withers wrote:
> Olaf Zanger wrote:
> > is the product planned to ship under GPL or an corresponding licence?
>
> Please don't shit it under GPL, it makes it much less useful :-S
> A variant of the Zope License would be much mroe
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Andrew Kenneth Milton wrote:
> | > > is the product planned to ship under GPL or an corresponding licence?
> | >
> | > Please don't shit it under GPL, it makes it much less useful :-S
> | > A variant of the Zope License would be much mro
+---[ Oleg Broytmann ]--
| On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Chris Withers wrote:
| > Olaf Zanger wrote:
| > >
| > > is the product planned to ship under GPL or an corresponding licence?
| >
| > Please don't shit it under GPL, it makes it much less useful :-S
On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Chris Withers wrote:
> Olaf Zanger wrote:
> >
> > is the product planned to ship under GPL or an corresponding licence?
>
> Please don't shit it under GPL, it makes it much less useful :-S
> A variant of the Zope License would be much mroe friend
Olaf Zanger wrote:
>
> is the product planned to ship under GPL or an corresponding licence?
Please don't shit it under GPL, it makes it much less useful :-S
A variant of the Zope License would be much mroe friendly :-)
cheers,
Chris
_
17 matches
Mail list logo
