[Zope] Re: Improved Zope Org Proposal

2006-06-27 Thread Maik Ihde

 This is sounding more bizzare with each day and it doesnt feel good.  
 Zope cant maintain a friggin web site?  Isnt that rich.

Taht's not the point. The problem is not the technology, but the human resources
you need to fill such a big Zope Website with Life (i.E. hi quality content).
The Plone Community has achieved this goal, so methinks we should think what
they did to make it happen...

We have the same problem in Germany regarding http://www.zope.de/ which will
soon be relaunched (see http://new.zope.de/ ) - it's just a very few people that
can spend some of their limited time. So it's going foward slowly and we do not
have as much content already there, as I personally wish. However we hope to
attract some more people within the German speaking Community and to get more
content in there after the launch...

Kind Regards from Munich
Maik
 



___
Zope maillist  -  Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )


[Zope] Re: Improved Zope Org Proposal

2006-06-27 Thread Maik Ihde
 has offered resources to accomplish this to finally happen.  They
 currently have taken the artistic work done by Tom Von Lahndorff and put
 it online at http://new.zope.nl for preview.  I'd like to forward

Which looks great, methinks. And an advertising Site for Zope should look
exciiting, as ror and other hyped frameworks have shown already.

 A group of people in the (Plone) community have volunteered
 their time and resources to put together an improved,
 **interim** zope.org site.  We understand that work is

Hmm. I agree that it is a good Idea, to improve zope.org quickly and I think
that this way looks promising. However, such **interim** Solutions tend to last
longer than they are expected to last. We should be aware that this interim
Solution may be there for a couple of years. 

 * Existing community content on zope.org will NOT be migrated.

Good Idea - there is so much outdated content there.

   The content will be made available on ZC's existing server
   via URL rewriting (to keep existing links from breaking) or
   by moving everything to an old.zope.org domain.  The best
   content will be migrated by hand to PloneHelpCenter / 
   PloneSoftwareCenter products.

+1 if the old stuff is still accessible and if any noob can see that this is old
 stuff...

 * The zope.org site should acknowledge contributors in a overt fashion.
 Zope Rock Stars who have risen up above the call of duty,
 contributors, etc should be noted.  The Foundation can determine how to
 implement this, but those paying for and providing services should
 receive acknowledgment.

Yes that ist an important point. If you acknowledge content contributors they
(and maybe others) will more likely keep on contributing. The documentation Area
on plone.org shows the authors picture for tutorials - I believe that there are
quite a few people out there which will be motivated by a small photo + text
which recognises the author...

Kind Regards
Maik


___
Zope maillist  -  Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )


[Zope] Re: Improved Zope Org Proposal

2006-06-27 Thread Max M

Chris Withers wrote:

David H wrote:
This is sounding more bizzare with each day and it doesnt feel good.  
Zope cant maintain a friggin web site?  Isnt that rich.


Hey David,

Cool, thanks so much for volunteering to provide all the resources, 
coders and support staff to look after a 10,000 user site with all the 
problems that entails.


Oh? What's that? You weren't volunteering?



Personally I have not visited zope.org for a few years for anything 
other than releases. And I am a long time pro developer.


It seems pretty obvious these days that having a one-shop zope.org site 
is too ambitious. Perhaps even wrong guided.



I wouldn't even know what should be on it. Zope 2 development mostly 
means Plone these days. Plone has a great site already, so no reason to 
do to much about that.



Pure Zope 3 is in even less use than pure Zope 2.

The exciting stuff is going on in Five and 2-3 integration. But why the 
heck make a site about that?


You could say that zope has been beaten by its own success.


The only sensible approach I can see is to make a new zope.org with 
releases, installation guides etc. It should also showcases the great 
cms/applications that are build on top of it. With links to those sites.


On those individual sites there are lots of documentation, product 
releases programming tricks etc.



Eg. I develop in Plone, and practically all I knew about programming in 
pure Zope 2 is useless now that I am using UML/AT/AGX in Plone. It's 
like assembly language to a python programmer. I assume that it is the 
same for other frameworks.


Having a 'Products' section on zope.org probably doesn't even make sense 
anymore. It is simply to low level.



Drop all the old documentation and move it to old.zope.org. Just in 
cases there is a nugget somewhere.



--

hilsen/regards Max M, Denmark

http://www.mxm.dk/
IT's Mad Science

Phone:  +45 66 11 84 94
Mobile: +45 29 93 42 96

___
Zope maillist  -  Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce

http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )


Re: [Zope] Re: Improved Zope Org Proposal

2006-06-27 Thread Jens Vagelpohl

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


On 27 Jun 2006, at 11:46, Max M wrote:
Eg. I develop in Plone, and practically all I knew about  
programming in pure Zope 2 is useless now that I am using UML/AT/ 
AGX in Plone. It's like assembly language to a python programmer. I  
assume that it is the same for other frameworks.


Having a 'Products' section on zope.org probably doesn't even make  
sense anymore. It is simply to low level.


I agree with all your points, but not with dropping the Products  
section. Believe it or not, there is life outside of Plone. Yes, for  
most people that seems to be a strange notion nowadays. There are a  
few odd people who don't use it and who are running pure Zope products.


jens

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFEoQ2CRAx5nvEhZLIRAgDMAJ9z9S2fzLshOczv9yywW6AlP2n8zQCeOPMr
JGysGqYHREcbtiKCdIWG6AE=
=4wXy
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Zope maillist  -  Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce

http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )


Re: [Zope] Re: Improved Zope Org Proposal

2006-06-27 Thread Jake
Zope.org is becoming a worse and worse face of Zope.

If anyone were to ask me about Zope at this point, I would point them to
Plone.org which not only has more relevant data, better searches, better
organization but, of course, looks good.

Just my personal opinion, but if Zope Corp is going to use the namesake of
Zope they should also take on Zope.org as a full responsibility, meaning
all aspects with someone who is a full time Zope.org person.

Jake
___
http://www.ZopeZone.com


On Tue, June 27, 2006 5:46 am, Max M said:
 Chris Withers wrote:
 David H wrote:
 This is sounding more bizzare with each day and it doesnt feel good.
 Zope cant maintain a friggin web site?  Isnt that rich.

 Hey David,

 Cool, thanks so much for volunteering to provide all the resources,
 coders and support staff to look after a 10,000 user site with all the
 problems that entails.

 Oh? What's that? You weren't volunteering?


 Personally I have not visited zope.org for a few years for anything
 other than releases. And I am a long time pro developer.

 It seems pretty obvious these days that having a one-shop zope.org site
 is too ambitious. Perhaps even wrong guided.


 I wouldn't even know what should be on it. Zope 2 development mostly
 means Plone these days. Plone has a great site already, so no reason to
 do to much about that.


 Pure Zope 3 is in even less use than pure Zope 2.

 The exciting stuff is going on in Five and 2-3 integration. But why the
 heck make a site about that?

 You could say that zope has been beaten by its own success.


 The only sensible approach I can see is to make a new zope.org with
 releases, installation guides etc. It should also showcases the great
 cms/applications that are build on top of it. With links to those sites.

 On those individual sites there are lots of documentation, product
 releases programming tricks etc.


 Eg. I develop in Plone, and practically all I knew about programming in
 pure Zope 2 is useless now that I am using UML/AT/AGX in Plone. It's
 like assembly language to a python programmer. I assume that it is the
 same for other frameworks.

 Having a 'Products' section on zope.org probably doesn't even make sense
 anymore. It is simply to low level.


 Drop all the old documentation and move it to old.zope.org. Just in
 cases there is a nugget somewhere.


 --

 hilsen/regards Max M, Denmark

 http://www.mxm.dk/
 IT's Mad Science

 Phone:  +45 66 11 84 94
 Mobile: +45 29 93 42 96

 ___
 Zope maillist  -  Zope@zope.org
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
 **   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
 (Related lists -
  http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
  http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )



___
Zope maillist  -  Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )