Ron Bickers wrote:
Except that I don't have Apache installed anymore. :-) I know at one time it
did not report Zope, but that may have been way back before I was using
mod_proxy.
I see that the ozzope.org Plone site reports Apache. So they must not be
using mod_proxy, yes?
Porbably both
On 2/16/06, Ron Bickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu February 16 2006 03:31, you wrote:
http://www.lighttpd.net/
How many millions of people use this a day?
I have no idea. Far less than use Apache, of course, but the number appears
to be growing steadily.
The netcraft survey for
On Fri February 17 2006 04:32, Martijn Pieters wrote:
The netcraft survey for February counted 21699 instances of lighttpd;
Zope was counted 41656 times:
http://survey.netcraft.com/Reports/200602/
The numbers are those seen by Netcraft during January.
Lighttpd is barely three years old.
Ron Bickers wrote:
Both lighty and Apache use OpenSSL.
Good point ;-)
I'm using it and haven't seen any
battlefield casualties so far. ;-) Apache has its share of (even recent)
security issues, including some related to mod_ssl.
Honestly, I see that as a good thing! It's a bit like the
On 2/17/06, Ron Bickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I noticed that my lighttpd server that proxies to Zope responds as
Zope/ZServer, not lighttpd. If I recall, Apache said Apache. There must be
many more Zopes than netcraft shows, right?
No, Zope behind Apache with ProxyPass also reports as
On Fri February 17 2006 05:19, Martijn Pieters wrote:
On 2/17/06, Ron Bickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I noticed that my lighttpd server that proxies to Zope responds as
Zope/ZServer, not lighttpd. If I recall, Apache said Apache. There
must be many more Zopes than netcraft shows, right?
Ron Bickers schrieb:
On Fri February 17 2006 05:19, Martijn Pieters wrote:
...
Ok. I thought it was reporting Apache for me before, but I don't recall for
sure. Does using mod_rewrite with [P] report the same?
Yes, and its working internally identically :-)
Apache as frontend proxy
On Fri February 17 2006 14:05, Tino Wildenhain wrote:
Apache as frontend proxy returning apache must be a common
urban legend. This pops up from time to time albeit
its so easy to check and make sure ;-)
Except that I don't have Apache installed anymore. :-) I know at one time it
did not
Ron Bickers wrote:
On Wed February 15 2006 02:42, Janusz Zamecki wrote:
The easiest way is to use Apache, but I have reasons to not go that way.
If you don't want big Apache, lighttpd is small and has made a good SSL
front-end proxy to Zope for me.
http://www.lighttpd.net/
How many
zope napisa?(a):
Hi,
zhttps provides an HTTPS Zserver to Zope-2.9.0. This zope product uses
M2Crypto. I think this may give you a hint towards SSL and Zope-2.9.0
http://www.zope.org/Members/lerouxa/zopehttps
Try it first with test certificates provided with
On Wed February 15 2006 02:42, Janusz Zamecki wrote:
The easiest way is to use Apache, but I have reasons to not go that way.
If you don't want big Apache, lighttpd is small and has made a good SSL
front-end proxy to Zope for me.
http://www.lighttpd.net/
--
Ron
Hello,
Is anyone tried to access Zope 2.9 via SSL? I've tried m2crypto, but
this doesn't work with the newest zope. And I've tried to use stunnel,
but I'm stuck with some problems - I cannot find the way to force zope
to use https://xxx urls with choosen stunnel port number.
The easiest way
12 matches
Mail list logo
