Re: [Zope] Zope 2.9 and SSL

2006-02-20 Thread Chris Withers
Ron Bickers wrote: Except that I don't have Apache installed anymore. :-) I know at one time it did not report Zope, but that may have been way back before I was using mod_proxy. I see that the ozzope.org Plone site reports Apache. So they must not be using mod_proxy, yes? Porbably both

Re: [Zope] Zope 2.9 and SSL

2006-02-17 Thread Martijn Pieters
On 2/16/06, Ron Bickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu February 16 2006 03:31, you wrote: http://www.lighttpd.net/ How many millions of people use this a day? I have no idea. Far less than use Apache, of course, but the number appears to be growing steadily. The netcraft survey for

Re: [Zope] Zope 2.9 and SSL

2006-02-17 Thread Ron Bickers
On Fri February 17 2006 04:32, Martijn Pieters wrote: The netcraft survey for February counted 21699 instances of lighttpd; Zope was counted 41656 times: http://survey.netcraft.com/Reports/200602/ The numbers are those seen by Netcraft during January. Lighttpd is barely three years old.

Re: [Zope] Zope 2.9 and SSL

2006-02-17 Thread Chris Withers
Ron Bickers wrote: Both lighty and Apache use OpenSSL. Good point ;-) I'm using it and haven't seen any battlefield casualties so far. ;-) Apache has its share of (even recent) security issues, including some related to mod_ssl. Honestly, I see that as a good thing! It's a bit like the

Re: [Zope] Zope 2.9 and SSL

2006-02-17 Thread Martijn Pieters
On 2/17/06, Ron Bickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I noticed that my lighttpd server that proxies to Zope responds as Zope/ZServer, not lighttpd. If I recall, Apache said Apache. There must be many more Zopes than netcraft shows, right? No, Zope behind Apache with ProxyPass also reports as

Re: [Zope] Zope 2.9 and SSL

2006-02-17 Thread Ron Bickers
On Fri February 17 2006 05:19, Martijn Pieters wrote: On 2/17/06, Ron Bickers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I noticed that my lighttpd server that proxies to Zope responds as Zope/ZServer, not lighttpd. If I recall, Apache said Apache. There must be many more Zopes than netcraft shows, right?

Re: [Zope] Zope 2.9 and SSL

2006-02-17 Thread Tino Wildenhain
Ron Bickers schrieb: On Fri February 17 2006 05:19, Martijn Pieters wrote: ... Ok. I thought it was reporting Apache for me before, but I don't recall for sure. Does using mod_rewrite with [P] report the same? Yes, and its working internally identically :-) Apache as frontend proxy

Re: [Zope] Zope 2.9 and SSL

2006-02-17 Thread Ron Bickers
On Fri February 17 2006 14:05, Tino Wildenhain wrote: Apache as frontend proxy returning apache must be a common urban legend. This pops up from time to time albeit its so easy to check and make sure ;-) Except that I don't have Apache installed anymore. :-) I know at one time it did not

Re: [Zope] Zope 2.9 and SSL

2006-02-16 Thread Chris Withers
Ron Bickers wrote: On Wed February 15 2006 02:42, Janusz Zamecki wrote: The easiest way is to use Apache, but I have reasons to not go that way. If you don't want big Apache, lighttpd is small and has made a good SSL front-end proxy to Zope for me. http://www.lighttpd.net/ How many

Re: [Zope] Zope 2.9 and SSL

2006-02-16 Thread Janusz Zamecki
zope napisa?(a): Hi, zhttps provides an HTTPS Zserver to Zope-2.9.0. This zope product uses M2Crypto. I think this may give you a hint towards SSL and Zope-2.9.0 http://www.zope.org/Members/lerouxa/zopehttps Try it first with test certificates provided with

Re: [Zope] Zope 2.9 and SSL

2006-02-15 Thread Ron Bickers
On Wed February 15 2006 02:42, Janusz Zamecki wrote: The easiest way is to use Apache, but I have reasons to not go that way. If you don't want big Apache, lighttpd is small and has made a good SSL front-end proxy to Zope for me. http://www.lighttpd.net/ -- Ron