I feel zserver somewhat dumber on windows 95 than on linux. a p200
machine with windows 95 is considerably slower inrentering pages than a
p166 with linux.
Toby Dickenson wrote:
On Sat, 07 Oct 2000 01:57:40 +0200, "Ansgar W. Konermann"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Definitely, yea!
>
>> I would
which publications?
it sounded like dunno, if there is a publication that dares to
say that, they ARE lying.
knight wrote:
> Don't you all Zope mailinglist participants think
that Aitor Grajal owe us all an excuse in the form of a NEW TEST with the
Win32 ZServer running properly?
> ;-)
> Esp
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 01:39:41PM +0100, Toby Dickenson wrote:
>>> We have been stress testing our Zope application on NT and Linux. Our
>>> conclusion is that OS is not a factor in Zope performance.
> Its all application-specific, and theres nothing I can release at the
> moment. Essentially th
>> We have been stress testing our Zope application on NT and Linux. Our
>> conclusion is that OS is not a factor in Zope performance.
>Can we see some profiling data from that to support your statement?
Its all application-specific, and theres nothing I can release at the
moment. Essentially th
> On Sat, 07 Oct 2000 01:57:40 +0200, "Ansgar W. Konermann"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Definitely, yea!
> >
> >> I would really be interested in its correct results.
>
> We have been stress testing our Zope application on NT and Linux. Our
> conclusion is that OS is not a factor in Zope p
On Sat, 07 Oct 2000 01:57:40 +0200, "Ansgar W. Konermann"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Definitely, yea!
>
>> I would really be interested in its correct results.
We have been stress testing our Zope application on NT and Linux. Our
conclusion is that OS is not a factor in Zope performance.
Toby
>Correct me, if i am wrong, but AFAIK ZServer (coming with Zope)
>is multi-threaded by default, whereas Apache/Zope uses PCGI or
>FCGI and is *not* multi-treaded.
You can use Apache/Zope without PCGI or FCGI (via ProxyPass) too.
>There's a big difference in the number of requests per second, four times
>more in the Windows machine.
>Anyone knows why? Does it mean that Zope running in Windows is better than
>in Linux?
When you think that this is the reality in the web, then yes.
But, if you think of the following scena
> Don't you all Zope mailinglist participants think that Aitor Grajal owe us all an
>excuse in the form of a NEW TEST with the Win32 ZServer running properly?
> ;-)
> Especially to all Linux supporters for the badwill of the emails title.
>
> I would really be interested in its correct results.
To get ACCURATE timings, you need to create the situations almost
identical, other than the operating system.
So, that means:
1) Windows and Linux tunings should be similar; are you running extra
daemons on the Linux box that Windows isn't (smtp, ftp, etc)?
2) The server architecture should
On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, Tom Deprez wrote:
> Why do you test the one with ZServer and the other with Apache?
> If you want correct results you've to test both with ZServer or both with
> Zope behind Apache. Not?
>
> Tom.
Exactly, or atleast both ZServer. You can definately attribute some
latency due
Hi all!
Peter Bengtsson wrote:
>
> Don't you all Zope mailinglist participants think that Aitor Grajal owe us all an
>excuse in the form of a NEW TEST with the Win32 ZServer running properly?
Definitely, yea!
> I would really be interested in its correct results.
Me too. :-)
Cheerio!
Ansga
Don't you all Zope mailinglist participants think that Aitor Grajal owe us all an
excuse in the form of a NEW TEST with the Win32 ZServer running properly?
;-)
Especially to all Linux supporters for the badwill of the emails title.
I would really be interested in its correct results.
Cheers eve
Are you using Zope behind apache under Linux? Or it's a direct request to
ZServer? As I can see the files are not the same, try to bench exactly the same
file...
On Fri, 06 Oct 2000, you wrote:
>
> Hi, I have a problem with Zope speed.
> I've done benchmarking in two machines, with the same har
both of them go through the apache server, cos I have installed a proxy server (the
reason is that windows is located on a different machine, and the proxy redirects to
the windows zserver)
thanks.
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 06/10/2000 at 17:27 Tom Deprez wrote:
>Why do you t
Why do you test the one with ZServer and the other with Apache?
If you want correct results you've to test both with ZServer or both with
Zope behind Apache. Not?
Tom.
___
Zope maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
> Concurrency Level: 25
> Time taken for tests: 1.807 seconds
> Complete requests: 1000
> Failed requests:137
>(Connect: 0, Length: 137, Exceptions: 0)
> Non-2xx responses: 864
> Total transferred: 660974 bytes
> HTML transferred: 473471 bytes
> Requests pe
Hi all.
Correct me, if i am wrong, but AFAIK ZServer (coming with Zope)
is multi-threaded by default, whereas Apache/Zope uses PCGI or
FCGI and is *not* multi-treaded.
Best regards,
Ansgar W. Konermann
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.inf.tu-dresden.de/~ak26
_
18 matches
Mail list logo
