Brian Sullivan wrote at 2006-4-5 14:12 -0400:
> ...
>> However, Zope3 allows you to configure the rules.
>> Thus, you can allow names starting with '+'.
>>
>
>Starting with a "+"? What about containing a "+"?
In Zope3, you decide about the naming rules.
>What about Zope 2?
In Zope2, only a few s
--On 5. April 2006 14:12:15 -0400 Brian Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Starting with a "+"? What about containing a "+"?
What about Zope 2?
The reason this is an issue for me is that I have a whole bunch of
content that has directories using "+" in the name that I would like
to upl
On 4/5/06, Dieter Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brian Sullivan wrote at 2006-4-4 12:38 -0400:
> >On 4/4/06, Lennart Regebro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I think it is a reserved name in Zope3. + are there used for the views
> >> that help create new objects.
> >
> >
> >Seems like a strateg
Brian Sullivan wrote at 2006-4-4 12:38 -0400:
>On 4/4/06, Lennart Regebro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I think it is a reserved name in Zope3. + are there used for the views
>> that help create new objects.
>
>
>Seems like a strategic design mistake though doesn't it?
I agree with you...
However
Brian Sullivan wrote at 2006-4-4 12:04 -0400:
> ...
>Why is "+" a prohibited name for a zope object?
Almost surely, due to a stupidity:
Why would you want to use anything beside letters, numbers,
and characters from "-_~,.$()# " in ids?
You probably see a reason (as I do) but the Zope author
On 4/4/06, Brian Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Seems like a strategic design mistake though doesn't it?
Which one? Calling adders "+" or creating objects called "+"? ;-)
--
Lennart Regebro, Nuxeo http://www.nuxeo.com/
CPS Content Management http://www.cps-project.org/
On 4/4/06, Lennart Regebro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/4/06, Brian Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why is "+" a prohibited name for a zope object? As a solution Andy
> > Mackay suggests modifying zope to allow "+" in a zope object name. Is
> > there a downside to this?
>
> I think it
On 4/4/06, Brian Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why is "+" a prohibited name for a zope object? As a solution Andy
> Mackay suggests modifying zope to allow "+" in a zope object name. Is
> there a downside to this?
I think it is a reserved name in Zope3. + are there used for the views
that
I am running into the problem mentioned in:
http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope/2003-October/141868.html
I have "+" used in a directory name of some content generated outside
zope that I want to upload. Preserving the directory name is necessary
for the integrity of the data.
Why is "+" a prohib
