- Original Message -
From: "Lalo Martins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2000 6:37 PM
Subject: Re: [Zope] Status of HiperDom, again ;-) (Re: [Zope] Presentation &
Object Model)
| On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 04:08:06PM +0
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 04:08:06PM +0100, Martijn Pieters wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 03:00:47PM -0200, Lalo Martins wrote:
> > The only thing that *can* happen before that, if I feel like it
> > and have a free weekend, is a version of HiperDom based on 4DOM
> > instead of the old xml-sig co
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 03:00:47PM -0200, Lalo Martins wrote:
> The only thing that *can* happen before that, if I feel like it
> and have a free weekend, is a version of HiperDom based on 4DOM
> instead of the old xml-sig code. Version 1.0 definitely *will*
> be based on 4DOM, as that is the offi
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 01:20:06PM +, Chris Withers wrote:
> Paul Everitt wrote:
>
> >
> > Brian veto'd it, declaring it too ambitious. He's basically waiting for
> > Zope to better figure out how to keep presentation separate from the object
> > model.
>
> Been pretty quiet on the lists W
Paul Everitt wrote:
>
> Brian veto'd it, declaring it too ambitious. He's basically waiting for
> Zope to better figure out how to keep presentation separate from the object
> model.
Been pretty quiet on the lists WRT HiperDOM, which I got the impression
was going to be about this. Are there a
