Re: [Zope] Re: zdsock

2005-12-12 Thread Chris Withers
John Poltorak wrote: Are you saying that Zope cannot be restarted through ZMI on Windows? Who does that anyway? Even on unix, I use zopectl restart, That is the point - zopectl uses a socket - 'zdsock'. Oh right, well, no, you don't have that kind of socket on WIndoze as far as I know :-

Re: [Zope] Re: zdsock

2005-12-09 Thread John Poltorak
On Fri, Dec 09, 2005 at 10:48:49AM +, Chris Withers wrote: > John Poltorak wrote: > > > > Are you saying that Zope cannot be restarted through ZMI on Windows? > > Who does that anyway? > > Even on unix, I use zopectl restart, That is the point - zopectl uses a socket - 'zdsock'. > > At th

Re: [Zope] Re: zdsock

2005-12-09 Thread Chris Withers
John Poltorak wrote: Are you saying that Zope cannot be restarted through ZMI on Windows? Who does that anyway? Even on unix, I use zopectl restart, my production zope stuff on windows is just scheduled tasks running from Task Scheduler... At the moment, the problem is being able to provid

Re: [Zope] Re: zdsock

2005-12-08 Thread John Poltorak
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 09:13:00AM +, Chris Withers wrote: > Tres Seaver wrote: > >>Ah, okay. How does this work on windows? > > > > > > zdaemon / zopectl *don't* work on windows. > > oh, my OS is broken *schniff* Are you saying that Zope cannot be restarted through ZMI on Windows? > >>Wh

[Zope] Re: zdsock

2005-12-08 Thread Chris Withers
Tres Seaver wrote: Ah, okay. How does this work on windows? zdaemon / zopectl *don't* work on windows. oh, my OS is broken *schniff* What's wrong with the default name? Th the original poster's case, his OS requires that Unix-domain sockets have mangled names. ...and so is his ;-) Chr

Re: [Zope] Re: zdsock

2005-12-08 Thread John Poltorak
On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 09:02:11AM -0500, Tres Seaver wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Chris Withers wrote: > > Tres Seaver wrote: > > > >> You have confused the "server socket" (which is set in the > >> section) with the "daemon control socket (set in in the > >> ze

[Zope] Re: zdsock

2005-12-07 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chris Withers wrote: > Tres Seaver wrote: > >> You have confused the "server socket" (which is set in the >> section) with the "daemon control socket (set in in the >> zeo.conf file; not currently settable in zope.conf). The control >> socket has

[Zope] Re: zdsock

2005-12-07 Thread Chris Withers
Tres Seaver wrote: You have confused the "server socket" (which is set in the section) with the "daemon control socket (set in in the zeo.conf file; not currently settable in zope.conf). The control socket has to be a Unix-domain socket. John is asking to surface an existing zdaemon feature

[Zope] Re: zdsock

2005-12-06 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chris Withers wrote: > John Poltorak wrote: > >> Zope itself works fine when started via runzope, so what is the >> problem in trying to provide an alternate socket name? >> >> zdctl is supposed to accept an alternative socket name:- >> >> -s/--socket

Re: [Zope] Re: zdsock

2005-12-04 Thread John Poltorak
On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 09:15:34AM -0500, Tres Seaver wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > John Poltorak wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 11:32:15AM +0100, Andreas Jung wrote: > > > >>WHY? > > > > > > Because 'zdsock' is not an acceptable name. > > > > I am running on

[Zope] Re: zdsock

2005-12-04 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 John Poltorak wrote: > On Sun, Dec 04, 2005 at 11:32:15AM +0100, Andreas Jung wrote: > >>WHY? > > > Because 'zdsock' is not an acceptable name. > > I am running on OS/2 and the path name must start with '\\socket\\'. Johh, you are likely going to