On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 08:31:52AM -0400, Coleman, Bryan wrote:
> That would cause another whole set of problems, unless apache is inherity
> more secure than Medusa. I was really wondering what the risks are
> associated with those two options.
I think Zope behind apache is more secure than zope
Since I do this type of thing for a living, I can tell
you the best answer is Option B. If your company is that
security paranoid, a DMZ is always a better idea than
poking holes in end-to-end connections in the firewall.
On 12-Sep-2000 Coleman, Bryan wrote:
> I almost have my company convinced
nologies
> (336)273-2428 ext-416
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From:Phil Harris [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent:Tuesday, September 12, 2000 5:15 AM
>> To: Coleman, Bryan; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re: [Zope] Impo
age-
> From: Phil Harris [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 5:15 AM
> To: Coleman, Bryan; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Zope] Important Security Concerns
>
> Another option might be to proxy the Zope server through Apache on port
> 80
Another option might be to proxy the Zope server through Apache on port 80.
- Original Message -
From: "Coleman, Bryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 12:43 PM
Subject: [Zope] Important Security Concerns
> I almost have my company convince
