Re: [Zope] OT:NT and rebooting

2000-10-25 Thread Wolfgang Strobl
On 25 Oct 2000, at 16:50, Bill Anderson wrote: > OK, tim e fo rme to weigh in on this. Reboot frequency is a matter of > experience and perspective. I don't believe that broadening the discussion along these lines will serve this mailing list in any way, so I refrain from commenting on most o

Re: [Zope] OT:NT and rebooting

2000-10-25 Thread Bill Anderson
Wolfgang Strobl wrote: > > On 25 Oct 2000, at 16:00, J. Atwood wrote: > > > "Months without rebooting"? > > > > That is certainly not something to brag about. > > Huh? Did anybody? Certainly not me. :-{ > > In case I didn't make myself clear: for running Zope; I don't care > much whether the O

Re: [Zope] OT:NT and rebooting

2000-10-25 Thread Wolfgang Strobl
On 25 Oct 2000, at 16:00, J. Atwood wrote: > "Months without rebooting"? > > That is certainly not something to brag about. Huh? Did anybody? Certainly not me. :-{ In case I didn't make myself clear: for running Zope; I don't care much whether the OS needs a reboot every month, every year, o

RE: [Zope] OT:NT and rebooting

2000-10-25 Thread Max M
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of >It's FUD. I'M running Zope on two NT servers here, which run many months >between reboots. I just checked - the Zope on the intranet server has an uptime >of 34 days 8 hours 32 min 3 sec now. I must say that I agree. All in all for

Re: [Zope] OT:NT and rebooting

2000-10-25 Thread Rik Hoekstra
> "Months without rebooting"? > > That is certainly not something to brag about. With three of my > installations of Zope on Linux I have the machines at 194, 204 and 55 days > of uptime (and the 55 was because of a bad powerstrip, the other others have > been up since I brought them up). While

Re: [Zope] OT:NT and rebooting

2000-10-25 Thread J. Atwood
om: "Wolfgang Strobl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Organization: GMD > Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 21:13:32 +0200 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Zope] OT:NT and rebooting > > [...] To: trimmed to zope.org > > On 25 Oct 2000, 23:49 Bak @ kedai wrote: >

Re: [Zope] OT:NT and rebooting (was:How many houres do I need to manage a Zope) site?

2000-10-25 Thread Rik Hoekstra
BC to get to a local MS Access Database. Bummer. > > Troy > > -Original Message- > From: Bak @ kedai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 10:49 AM > To: Diny van Gool; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; J. Atwood > Subject: Re: [Zope] OT:NT and re

Re: [Zope] OT:NT and rebooting

2000-10-25 Thread Wolfgang Strobl
[...] To: trimmed to zope.org On 25 Oct 2000, 23:49 Bak @ kedai wrote: > > sorry if this is offtopic, but i see reference of rebooting every so > often with NT( and maybe W2K). is this real? or FUD? i use linux > myself and would like to confirm this from all you guys' experience It's FUD.

RE: [Zope] OT:NT and rebooting (was:How many houres do I need to manage a Zope) site?

2000-10-25 Thread Farrell, Troy
Bummer. Troy -Original Message- From: Bak @ kedai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2000 10:49 AM To: Diny van Gool; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; J. Atwood Subject: Re: [Zope] OT:NT and rebooting (was:How many houres do I need to manage a Zope) site? sorry if this is offt

Re: [Zope] OT:NT and rebooting (was:How many houres do I need tomanage a Zope) site?

2000-10-25 Thread Bak @ kedai
sorry if this is offtopic, but i see reference of rebooting every so often with NT( and maybe W2K). is this real? or FUD? i use linux myself and would like to confirm this from all you guys' experience >>Do I miss important tasks? Has anybody done this before? > >Yeah.. rebooting NT every 4 da