Previously Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 12 Feb 2007, at 17:42, Rocky wrote:
First off, please forgive me if this comes through twice... not sure
if I sent it the first time or not.
So here's what the consensus seems to be regarding CMF and the local
site manager business.
Hey Rocky, any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22 Feb 2007, at 09:03, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Hey Rocky, any progress? Haven't heard and loud yelling from Wichert
yet, but I think he's getting close to the Plone 3.0 beta by now...
I'm hoping for upcoming monday..
Merging the branch into
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 22 Feb 2007, at 09:03, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Hey Rocky, any progress? Haven't heard and loud yelling from Wichert
yet, but I think he's getting close to the Plone 3.0 beta by now...
I'm hoping for upcoming monday..
Merging the branch into the trunk is going to be
yuppie-3 wrote:
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 22 Feb 2007, at 09:03, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Hey Rocky, any progress? Haven't heard and loud yelling from Wichert
yet, but I think he's getting close to the Plone 3.0 beta by now...
I'm hoping for upcoming monday..
Merging the branch into
Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list.
Period Wed Feb 21 12:00:00 2007 UTC to Thu Feb 22 12:00:00 2007 UTC.
There were 9 messages: 9 from CMF Unit Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : CMF-1.5 Zope-2.7 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: CMF Unit Tests
Date: Wed Feb 21 21:40:05 EST
On Feb 22, 8:30 am, Martin Aspeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In my opinion only: I'm sure we can release a Plone beta 1 that depends on a
CMF alpha if that needs to be. It's not ideal, but we can synchronise a
little later if it's impractical for everyone involved.
So, Rocky - progress?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22 Feb 2007, at 11:27, yuppie wrote:
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 22 Feb 2007, at 09:03, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Hey Rocky, any progress? Haven't heard and loud yelling from
Wichert
yet, but I think he's getting close to the Plone 3.0 beta by
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 22 Feb 2007, at 11:27, yuppie wrote:
IIRC existing CMF sites stop working with that branch. That has to be
resolved before releasing a beta.
Right, my oversight. I believe the issue can be boiled down to the
existing CMF site needs to be turned into a Zope 3 'site'
On Feb 22, 11:06 am, yuppie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
Right, my oversight. I believe the issue can be boiled down to the
existing CMF site needs to be turned into a Zope 3 'site' and have a
site manager? Or are there more issues?
None I'm aware of.
There will be a
