[Zope-CMF] Re: Adapterizing CMFCore.WorkflowTool
Laurence Rowe a écrit : > I have made the changes on a branch: > http://svn.zope.org/Products.CMFCore/branches/adapterize-wfstatus-wfhistory > > This is branched from 2.1 so I could test with Plone. There is no test > coverage for status or history yet. I'll add some if the approach meets > with approval. > > Comments appreciated, specifically on: > > * I currently adapt based on (IContentish, IWorkflowDefinition) should > this be made more general, i.e. (Interface, IWorkflowDefinition)? Does > anyone workflow anything that is not IContentish? If CMF is focused only on CMS features, you shouldn't have workflow on something that is not a 'content'. Now, if you was involved in workflow sprint in Naples, you should know that we want something more powerful than a workflow focused on content: http://www.openplans.org/projects/plone-workflows/project-home > * Is depricating getStatusOf, setStatusOf, getHistoryOf desirable? I'm > not sure it would serve any particular purpose. I use these methods during export/import to/from oldier Plone version or to/from another CMS. It allows more readable code than making low level programmation to rebuild an history or to force a specific workflow state. Regards, -- Encolpe Degoute INGENIWEB (TM) - S.A.S 5 Euros - RC B 438 725 632 17 rue Louise Michel - 92300 Levallois Perret - France web : www.ingeniweb.com - « les Services Web Ingénieux » Tel : 01.78.15.24.08 / Fax : 01 47 57 39 14 ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests
[Zope-CMF] Re: Adapterizing CMFCore.WorkflowTool
I have made the changes on a branch: http://svn.zope.org/Products.CMFCore/branches/adapterize-wfstatus-wfhistory This is branched from 2.1 so I could test with Plone. There is no test coverage for status or history yet. I'll add some if the approach meets with approval. Comments appreciated, specifically on: * I currently adapt based on (IContentish, IWorkflowDefinition) should this be made more general, i.e. (Interface, IWorkflowDefinition)? Does anyone workflow anything that is not IContentish? * Is depricating getStatusOf, setStatusOf, getHistoryOf desirable? I'm not sure it would serve any particular purpose. Laurence ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests
[Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 11 OK
Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Tue Jan 29 12:00:00 2008 UTC to Wed Jan 30 12:00:00 2008 UTC. There were 11 messages: 11 from CMF Unit Tests. Tests passed OK --- Subject: OK : CMF-1.5 Zope-2.7 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: CMF Unit Tests Date: Tue Jan 29 21:25:15 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2008-January/007806.html Subject: OK : CMF-1.5 Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: CMF Unit Tests Date: Tue Jan 29 21:26:45 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2008-January/007807.html Subject: OK : CMF-1.5 Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: CMF Unit Tests Date: Tue Jan 29 21:28:16 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2008-January/007808.html Subject: OK : CMF-1.6 Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux From: CMF Unit Tests Date: Tue Jan 29 21:29:46 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2008-January/007809.html Subject: OK : CMF-1.6 Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: CMF Unit Tests Date: Tue Jan 29 21:31:16 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2008-January/007810.html Subject: OK : CMF-2.0 Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: CMF Unit Tests Date: Tue Jan 29 21:32:46 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2008-January/007811.html Subject: OK : CMF-2.0 Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: CMF Unit Tests Date: Tue Jan 29 21:34:16 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2008-January/007812.html Subject: OK : CMF-2.1 Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: CMF Unit Tests Date: Tue Jan 29 21:35:46 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2008-January/007813.html Subject: OK : CMF-2.1 Zope-trunk Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: CMF Unit Tests Date: Tue Jan 29 21:37:16 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2008-January/007814.html Subject: OK : CMF-trunk Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: CMF Unit Tests Date: Tue Jan 29 21:38:47 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2008-January/007815.html Subject: OK : CMF-trunk Zope-trunk Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: CMF Unit Tests Date: Tue Jan 29 21:40:17 EST 2008 URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2008-January/007816.html ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests
