[Zope-CMF] cmf-tests - OK: 3, UNKNOWN: 1

2011-08-07 Thread CMF tests summarizer
This is the summary for test reports received on the cmf-tests list between 2011-08-06 00:00:00 UTC and 2011-08-07 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds. An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our buildbot documentation: http://docs.zope.org/z

Re: [Zope-CMF] cmf-tests - OK: 3, UNKNOWN: 1

2011-08-07 Thread Charlie Clark
Am 07.08.2011, 20:45 Uhr, schrieb Hanno Schlichting : > So yes, while these changes look at bit evil, they do have a major > impact. Quite a speed-up! Unfortunately, as Jens has pointed out, it breaks DiscussionItem in a non-obvious way. Charlie -- Charlie Clark Managing Director Clark Cons

Re: [Zope-CMF] cmf-tests - OK: 3, UNKNOWN: 1

2011-08-07 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Charlie Clark wrote: > Hanno, have you got any stats on the optimisation? I looked briefly at the > changes and I'm not sure if this is really worth it. Nikolay is working on this and some more evil looking patches at https://github.com/fafhrd91/experimental.perfor

Re: [Zope-CMF] cmf-tests - OK: 3, UNKNOWN: 1

2011-08-07 Thread Charlie Clark
Am 07.08.2011, 17:13 Uhr, schrieb Jens Vagelpohl : > The problem appears in CMFDefault.DiscussionItem.createReply on line > 251, where the newly created discussion reply is aqcuisition-wrapped in > the talkback object: >item = DiscussionItem( id, title=title, description=title ) >

Re: [Zope-CMF] cmf-tests - OK: 3, UNKNOWN: 1

2011-08-07 Thread Jens Vagelpohl
On Aug 7, 2011, at 07:00 , CMF tests summarizer wrote: > > [1]UNKNOWN FAILED (failures=3, errors=4) : CMF-trunk Zope-trunk > Python-2.6.6 : Linux > https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/cmf-tests/2011-August/015089.html I have tried to pinpoint the reason for some of these test failures. Tw