Re: [Zope-CMF] Move to github?
I'm not major a CMF contributor and are unlikely to actually contribute much in the future, so I do not and should not have a say in the move. I'd just want to correct a factually incorrect statement though: On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:55 AM, yuppie y.2...@wcm-solutions.de wrote: Monopolies are bad. (At least if they are in private hand.) On the contrary, it's state supported monopolies that are bad. github, just like twitter and facebook, are still subject to market forces (and hence neither of them are actually monopolies in a strict sense, and just a dominant actor on the market, but that's nitpicking). As they are subject to market forces they can and will be deposed from being the major platform, if they stop doing a good job. Therefore, this type of monopoly are much less bad than any state-supported monopoly. This concludes this political broadcast. //Lennart ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests
Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] tools as utilities
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/06/2012 01:37 AM, Lennart Regebro wrote: On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote: And if we don't want to support more than one site the ZODB, there should be a warning of you try to do it, btw. I've got no problem with more than one CMF site in a single Zope instance; I just don't want to promote .zexp as the way to migrate such sites (that is what GS is for, after all). I'm confused now. GenericSetup has never been able to reliably export the content of a Plone site, to my knowledge. I'm sure we could make that happen, of course, but is that really less work than I have no idea what you man. GS has been the *only* means I have used for migrating CMF / Plone based sites for going on years now: I haven't used a .zexp export to do so in more than a decade (since well before GS was even released). (I am talking about sites with literally millions of content objects, BTW). Impressive, I usually have gotten errors during the export, because it tries to export content objects when I don't want to, I just want to back up the configuration. Of course, there is the problem that some configuration uses content objects, so if you try to export just configuration and not content you have problems anyway, but I don't know what we can do about that... (I have to say though that I think the claim that this is what GS is for probably is news to many. It was always pushed as a way to do *setup* not exporting content. Ah well). //Lennart ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests
Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] tools as utilities
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Charlie Clark charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu wrote: Am 05.09.2012, 11:48 Uhr, schrieb yuppie y.2...@wcm-solutions.de: I use a single Zope instance for several small CMF sites and I use .zexp export and import for moving CMF sites from one Zope instance to an other. Works fine for me. Even with Plone sites. Even if it works for you I'm not sure that this is a use case we should support. I think it is. We have to have some way to move a Plone site from one ZODB to another. //Lennart ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests
Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] tools as utilities
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Charlie Clark charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu wrote: No, one site per Data.fs is what we should support. This has more or less been the explicit aim of Zope 2.8 So you want to tell everyone that either has not received that message, or used Plone since before 2.5, That yeah, I know you can do that, but we were just messing with you so now you are fucked. Well, I don't think we should say that. And if we don't want to support more than one site the ZODB, there should be a warning of you try to do it, btw. //Lennart ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests
Re: [Zope-CMF] [dev] tools as utilities
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote: And if we don't want to support more than one site the ZODB, there should be a warning of you try to do it, btw. I've got no problem with more than one CMF site in a single Zope instance; I just don't want to promote .zexp as the way to migrate such sites (that is what GS is for, after all). I'm confused now. GenericSetup has never been able to reliably export the content of a Plone site, to my knowledge. I'm sure we could make that happen, of course, but is that really less work than having zexp work? :-) //Lennart ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests
Re: [Zope-CMF] GenericSetup: Question on StackOverflow
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 10:11, Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 4/9/11 09:09 , Suresh V. wrote: Please see: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/5603459/genericsetup-what-does-toolset-xml-accomplish-if-toolinit-still-has-to-be-called I could not create a cmf tag, so if you can please add that to the tags in the question. Not sure what that site is or does, but the only forums regularly visited and supported by the CMF developers are this mailing list and Launchpad. If you would like to ask a question please use those. But there are some Plone people lurking there, and plone is a good tag. But mailing lists will probably be faster than SO for any kind of tool that isn't wildly popular. //Lennart ___ Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@zope.org https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf See https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope-cmf/ for bug reports and feature requests