[Zope-CMF] CMF Collector: Open Issues

2007-03-14 Thread tseaver
The following supporters have open issues assigned to them in this collector (http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF). Assigned and Open mhammond - "Windows DevelopmentMode penalty in CMFCore.DirectoryView", [Accepted] http://www.zope.org/Collectors/CMF/366 Pending / Deferred Issues

[Zope-CMF] [dev] GenericSetup and five.localsitemanager: managing tool registrations

2007-03-14 Thread yuppie
Hi! The tools-as-utilities changes seem to run fine, but so far there is no easy way to manage the tool registrations in the local site manager. The site manager has no UI for inspecting or manipulating registrations, so I tried to use GenericSetup: While importing settings seems to work w

[Zope-CMF] CMF Tests: 9 OK, 2 Unknown

2007-03-14 Thread CMF Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the cmf-tests list. Period Tue Mar 13 12:00:00 2007 UTC to Wed Mar 14 12:00:00 2007 UTC. There were 11 messages: 11 from CMF Unit Tests. Unknown --- Subject: UNKNOWN : CMF-2.1 Zope-trunk Python-2.4.4 : Linux From: CMF Unit Tests Date: Tue Mar 13 22:39:41 EDT 2007 URL:

[Zope-CMF] Re: PersistentComponents: wrapped or not?

2007-03-14 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi, yuppie wrote: > Apparently I'm missing something because this doesn't make much sense to > me: > > ComponentRegistryXMLAdapterTests use > z.c.persistentregistry.PersistentComponents. These tests register > wrapped tools, the registry returns them with their original wrapper. > > If I add tra

[Zope-CMF] Re: [dev] GenericSetup and five.localsitemanager: managing tool registrations

2007-03-14 Thread Hanno Schlichting
Hi, yuppie wrote: > The tools-as-utilities changes seem to run fine, but so far there is no > easy way to manage the tool registrations in the local site manager. > > The site manager has no UI for inspecting or manipulating registrations, > so I tried to use GenericSetup: I think this is on the