Hi Martin!
Martin Aspeli wrote:
> yuppie wrote:
>> Martin Aspeli wrote:
>>> yuppie wrote:
>>>
AFAICS wrapping the object before looking up adapters is unnecessary.
The catalog should do the lookup directly and the existing features
provided by IndexableObjectWrapper should be rei
yuppie wrote:
> Why is IIndexableObjectWrapper in Plone a multi-adapter and not a simple
> adapter for object?
Some of the indexers need access to the site root. I think the idea was
that you could have different adapters in different types of sites by
marking the site root, but a single adapt
Hi,
>> Could we push this further down the stack to the ZCatalog, making it
>> unnecessary to override catalog_object in CMF? AFAICS all CMF-specific
>> stuff could be done inside the wrapper.
>
> Maybe. Touching ZCatalog is kinda scary, though.
I think trying to remove catalog_object comple
Wichert Akkerman wrote at 2009-3-10 10:01 +0100:
> ...
>The debate is currently focusing on GPL versus BSD license. Any opinions
>on a choice between those two would be very welcome.
I like BSD more, but could live with LGPL as well.
--
Dieter
___
Zo
Hi!
Miles wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
>>> Could we push this further down the stack to the ZCatalog, making it
>>> unnecessary to override catalog_object in CMF? AFAICS all CMF-specific
>>> stuff could be done inside the wrapper.
>> Maybe. Touching ZCatalog is kinda scary, though.
>
> I think trying
Hi Tres!
Tres Seaver wrote:
> yuppie wrote:
>> Tres Seaver wrote:
>>> Log message for revision 97800:
>>> Clean out module-scope imports.
>>>
[...]
>> What was wrong with these imports?
>
> I don't like module-scope imports in unit tests: I want tests to
> *fail*, not be skipped, when somethi
