Hi Tres,
As to your notes on the wiki:
* Zope3 style interfaces: this is fairly uncontroversial and not too painful
* Movement of presentation logic into Views gives us potentially great wins
* However, are you / we confident that we've found the best patterns
for utilities / adapters yet? I'm
On 7/13/05, yuppie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * However, are you / we confident that we've found the best patterns
> > for utilities / adapters yet? I'm not!
>
> Maybe we should first see what people want to contribute and decide
> later if we call it CMF 1.6 or 2.0.
>
> > In addition, I hav
On 11/30/05, Paul Everitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Still, I'm hoping that my small, 3-line proposal doesn't get changed
> into a "let's replace templating systems" discussion. :^) I'm trying to
> find the smallest necessary part to cover the maximum interest.
>
> Again to the CMF community: in
ow if you think I'm missing something. I'd like to fix
these issues and move the code to CMFDefault.utils.
Cheers,
Yuppie
___
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf
See http://collector.zop
