Re: [Zope-CMF] Re: Move GenericSetup out of CMF

2006-01-17 Thread Jens Vagelpohl


On 17 Jan 2006, at 20:47, Rocky Burt wrote:


Jens Vagelpohl wrote:


OK, all done now.

jens


Hmm... I think you forgot to do the svn:externals for CMF 1.6 branch
too? (was GenericSetup removed from there as well?)


No I did not.


Log message for revision 41349:
  - stitching GenericSetup back in as a svn:external and update docs.

Changed:
  _U  CMF/branches/1.6/
  U   CMF/branches/1.6/CHANGES.txt
  A   CMF/branches/1.6/EXTERNALS.txt
  U   CMF/branches/1.6/INSTALL.txt
  U   CMF/branches/1.6/INSTALL_SVN.txt


jens

___
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests


Re: [Zope-CMF] Re: Move GenericSetup out of CMF

2006-01-17 Thread Jens Vagelpohl


On 17 Jan 2006, at 16:36, Alexander Limi wrote:

On Tue, 17 Jan 2006 07:39:10 -0800, Tres Seaver  
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


I don't think the burden of maintaining 'svn:external' is worse  
than the

burden of maintaining the correct version ID in DEPENDENCIES.txt.  I
*want* to distribute GenericSetup with the CMF tarball, in fact,  
which

makes 'svn:external' seem the Right Thing (TM).


From experience, it's the only thing that *does* get maintained,  
since people's checkouts break. ;)


OK, all done now.

jens

___
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests


Re: [Zope-CMF] Re: Move GenericSetup out of CMF

2006-01-17 Thread Jens Vagelpohl


On 17 Jan 2006, at 15:39, Tres Seaver wrote:

What do people think, do we want a svn:external or do we want to just
mention it as a requirement in the docs (such as README, INSTALL,
DEPENDENCIES)?


I don't think the burden of maintaining 'svn:external' is worse  
than the

burden of maintaining the correct version ID in DEPENDENCIES.txt.  I
*want* to distribute GenericSetup with the CMF tarball, in fact, which
makes 'svn:external' seem the Right Thing (TM).


OK, I'll stitch that in tonight and change the docs back. I will  
point it at the trunk for right now since thats all there is at this  
point.


jens

___
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests


Re: [Zope-CMF] Re: Move GenericSetup out of CMF

2006-01-17 Thread Jens Vagelpohl


On 17 Jan 2006, at 16:13, Tres Seaver wrote:
I don't think the burden of maintaining 'svn:external' is worse   
than the

burden of maintaining the correct version ID in DEPENDENCIES.txt.  I
*want* to distribute GenericSetup with the CMF tarball, in fact,  
which

makes 'svn:external' seem the Right Thing (TM).



OK, I'll stitch that in tonight and change the docs back. I will   
point
it at the trunk for right now since thats all there is at this   
point.


I will look at making a 1.1 release for it to correspond with the CMF
2.0 beta.


Wouldn't it be better to make a 1.1 release to correspond with the  
2.0 final? Or are you following the same betas that CMF will have for  
2.0?


jens

___
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests