Hi,
If I have the following lines in a Python Product:
def __init__(self, id):
"""initialise a new instance of product"""
self.id = id
self.title = 'Title!'
self.anInt = 0
self.aString = 'testing'
Are these attributes protected by the security
I need the binarie file named _msql
does anybody got it (for any Linux)?
Because I can't build this file : I've got too many errors
Thanks in advance
Jérôme DIEBOLD
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:-(
Right, I have a Python product with a __call__ method that is
(hopefully) going to be used to render a navigation tree.
To do this (and have the tree expand in the right places) I need a list
of objects that need to be expanded.
I'm currently using the following expression to get this
Chris Withers wrote:
After more playing I've discovered that calling the resutl of aq_inner()
appears to be a very bad idea ;-)
The line:
print self.aq_inner()
in the __call__ method of a python product caused the python process to
dump an 'unknown software exception'.
Chris,
Have you tried Christian Tismers Stackless Python, which has 'infinite'
recursion capabilities?
www.stackless.com
Phil
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Withers" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Jim Fulton" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2000 2:09 PM
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000 07:42:29 -0400, Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Toby Dickenson wrote:
I'm not sure exactly what problem you are refering to. It sound's
like an issue of depending on a specific acquired name and having
the name overridden with something bogus. Is that it?
There
Chris Withers wrote:
Phil Harris wrote:
Have you tried Christian Tismers Stackless Python, which has 'infinite'
recursion capabilities?
I'm not sure this would be entirely helpful here ;-)
I wonder what aq_base(), over aq_base, does that causes an infinite
recursion?
Maybe I
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000 16:11:50 +0100, Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
So, if I give my product a class attribute of isDocTemp=1, what
signature should I give my product's __call__ method so it picks up the
DTML namespace?
Interestingly, Ive just put a HowTo that does this
From: "Jim Fulton" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We are going to provide an alternate interface, so that if
an object has a special method, then this will be called instead.
okay... which proposal/project is this in?
I don't remember. Evan?
PythonMethods, essentially, unless you'd really like me
It appears we still have a problem with ZServer's port 20 data
channel response behavior with the latest released Zope (Zope 2.2.1
(source release, python 1.5.2, linux2) and Active Mode ftp clients.
In particular, when you select the port-1 behavior, medusa can't
seem to bind to port 20 when
Chris Withers wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
So, if I give my product a class attribute of isDocTemp=1, what
signature should I give my product's __call__ method so it picks up the
DTML namespace?
def __call__(self, ignored, md): ...
Right, now if I call other DTML methods from my
Here's what Sam Rushing told me regarding this issue.
Shane Hathaway writes:
I hear that you have found a way to get Medusa to use the correct
port
in active mode FTP. This could be a great benefit to the Zope
community. Anything you have (diffs, modified files, or any kind of
info) on
Hi all,
First, I'm using Zope 2.2.1 (Debian package).
I've been trying to implement zope objects that behave like unix soft
links. The message
http://lists.zope.org/pipermail/zope-dev/2000-July/005963.html
by Shane proposes an implementation based in the __of__ method:
class SoftLink
Evan Simpson wrote:
PythonMethods, essentially, unless you'd really like me to make this a
separate project. It's *such* a small change, tho.
No, not at all, just where I can find some docs for this specific bit
would be more than sufficient :-)
cheers,
Chris
"Ibañez Palomar Juan David" wrote:
Hi all,
First, I'm using Zope 2.2.1 (Debian package).
I've been trying to implement zope objects that behave like unix soft
links. The message
http://lists.zope.org/pipermail/zope-dev/2000-July/005963.html
by Shane proposes an implementation
On 26 Sep 2000 12:50:00 -0500, Shane Hathaway wrote:
Here's what Sam Rushing told me regarding this issue.
Shane Hathaway writes:
I hear that you have found a way to get Medusa to use the correct
port
in active mode FTP. This could be a great benefit to the Zope
community. Anything you
Kent Polk wrote:
So you are saying ZServer just isn't ever going to support Active
ftp clients in the correct port-1 manner? If so, you might want
to put a LARGE BANNER disclaimer about this matter as this makes
ZServer unusable from most ftp clients that try to access it from
behind
From: Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Evan Simpson wrote:
PythonMethods, essentially, unless you'd really like me to make this a
separate project. It's *such* a small change, tho.
No, not at all, just where I can find some docs for this specific bit
would be more than sufficient :-)
Hi all,
Yesterday I put up a new proposal on the http://dev.zope.org site that
documents my vision of PersistentBlob. The main idea is the be able to
mark blocks of strings (text or binary) content for storage in a file
system as individual files. (Or blobs in a relation table.)
The two
Problem:
Encapsulation for plugable brains and other purposes are too hard.
ZClasses are a global kind of thing that requires going into a separate area
of the site which you have to have permission to use.
Also I find that I evolve my solutions. I will produce something in
folders that
20 matches
Mail list logo
