Recent sightings of the use of __bobo_traverse__ in SkinScript gave me hope
of giving users a more useable breadcrumbs trail in the case where I have
nested specialists.
My TaskTemplates specialist is nested inside my RequestTypes specialist.
When I retrieve a dataskin from the RequestTypes
Roch'e Compaan wrote:
Recent sightings of the use of __bobo_traverse__ in SkinScript gave me hope
of giving users a more useable breadcrumbs trail in the case where I have
nested specialists.
My TaskTemplates specialist is nested inside my RequestTypes specialist.
When I retrieve a
Steve Alexander wrote:
If ob is not found, you'll get an error raised. You need to have some
sort of marker for the default value.
Is there any reason why no-one uses None as a marker?
cheers,
Chris
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With your code below, and with a concrete example, can you say what you
want to happen, and what actually does happen?
Thus results in a url like this:
/RequestTypes/request type instance/Task Templates/task template
instance,
and what I ideally want is:
With your code below, and with a concrete example, can you say what you
want to happen, and what actually does happen?
In my traversal_method I have one line that simply changes a property on the
specialist to see if the method is actually called but it does not seem like
the traversal_method
There is a bug in 2.3.0a2 that prevents you from adding a Z Search
Interface. It is basically a pathing issue to a dtml file that moved.
The following is a patch for Aqueduct.py to temper this issue:
102c102
dtml_dir=Globals.package_home(globals())
---
Casey,
Thanks for these... the first one is a new one to me, and I'll look at it
(please still submit it so we can track it). The second is patched in a
branch that will be merged before the release of b1.
Chris
- Original Message -
From: "Casey Duncan" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
Simon Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think it needs an image content-type ?
Sorry, just my flaky link. For shame, to think such a thing.
My two cents on the screenshot:
- looks like good progress!
- the top bar as shown definitely doesn't make best use of my precious
screen space,
Am Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2001 20:10 schrieb Andy McKay:
Aaron has just helped me get Komodo debugging working for Zope. Both Neil
and I think this is great, for the first time we can see the
interaction of Zope internals as they happen (its no longer a black box
anymore). This shed so much
Howdy folks,
A new development release of the core session tracking implementation (which
allows you to store state between requests for anonymous visitors) is
available at
http://www.zope.org/Members/mcdonc/Products/CoreSessionTracking. The latest
release is 0.5.
Thanks,
- C
I am currently planning two separate 'Archive' type
projects/Products. In both cases, I need to make sure that
my implementation will scale to hundreds of thousands or
even millions of objects.
I would recommend using an RDMBS behind Zope then. Its faster, simpler and I
have always had
Andy McKay wrote:
I am currently planning two separate 'Archive' type
projects/Products. In both cases, I need to make sure that
my implementation will scale to hundreds of thousands or
even millions of objects.
I would recommend using an RDMBS behind Zope then. Its faster, simpler
I would like to echo Michael's sentiment and comments. I am at the
beginning stage of Zope development of a website which will have
millions of objects of a single object type and multiple of such. I
currently plan on using mounted databases for the various object
repositories and am currently
Jimmie Houchin wrote:
I would like to echo Michael's sentiment and comments. I am at the
beginning stage of Zope development of a website which will have
millions of objects of a single object type and multiple of such.
are your objects intended to be indexed by ZCatalog as well,
or are you
14 matches
Mail list logo
