Chris Withers wrote:
Is there a workaround in the meantime? This is turning into a real
showstopper for one of NIP's most important projects right now :~(
desperately,
Chris
I the meantime I have changed that method to the following:
def insertReverseIndexEntry(self, entry,
Dear All,
I am trying to add session tracking to a Product of mine. I am trying
to add a SessionDataManager to a Folderish object in the __init__ method
of the class, but having troubles. I think I am importing everything:
from Globals import HTMLFile
from Globals import Persistent
from
On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, Erik Stephens wrote:
Naively, I can think of 2 approaches: a shared memory approach or a
separate memory per thread with notifications. Zope behaves like each
thread as its own copy of in-memory pieces and sometimes these
per/thread memory blocks do not get updated.
That
I noticed that the most recent hotfix completely
denies access to the getClassAttr, setClassAttr and
delClassAttr from DTML. Is this going to be the
behavior for future Zope versions?
I know this will break code, so it might be prudent to
alert people when the fix is rolled into the next Zope
Mark,
Try putting the code which adds the session data manager from your class'
__init__ into a manage_afterAdd method of your class, e.g.:
def manage_afterAdd(self, item, container):
ob = SessionDataManager(
id='session_data_mgr', title='', path=None, timeout_mins=20)
Not really. In this case it seems appropriate, in others its not really
necessary. I hope my suggestion works. ;-)
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Hamilton" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Chris McDonough" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 10:43 AM
Subject: Re: [Zope-dev]
"R. David Murray" wrote:
On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, Erik Stephens wrote:
Naively, I can think of 2 approaches: a shared memory approach or a
separate memory per thread with notifications. Zope behaves like each
thread as its own copy of in-memory pieces and sometimes these
per/thread memory
"Phillip J. Eby" wrote:
At 09:37 AM 3/1/01 -0500, Shane Hathaway wrote:
What is your vision of integrating AOP into a persistent object system?
Would one drop in an object that modifies the class loading mechanism so
that the classes come from a TW component rather than Python modules?
I've also discovered that setting overlap = 0 actually causes
everything to overlap by 1. I didn't see anything in the collector
about this either...
-Brett
"Brett" == Brett Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Brett I'm running Zope 2.2.2, and I'm trying to use the batching stuff for
On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Erik Stephens wrote:
Thanks for the response. If I understand you correctly, then as long a
thread does not try to modify an out-of-date object, it will not try to
re-read the most current version? Is that the expected behaviour?
Hmm. Good question. I seem to remember
Brett Carter writes:
I'm running Zope 2.2.2, and I'm trying to use the batching stuff for
the dtml-in tag, however, I can't seem to access any attributes off
the 'next-batches' or 'previous-batches' mapping object that's
supposed to be available, with the attributes 'batch-start-index',
On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Shane Hathaway wrote:
"Phillip J. Eby" wrote:
One reason I've been racing like mad to get the preview release out is so
that, after seeing the usefulness of TW for the Zope 3 component
architecture, y'all might be interested in considering implementations for
module
Itai Tavor writes:
On Zope 2.3.0 and 2.3.1b1, the following method produces an error
when ZDebug is installed; If I remove ZDebug, it works fine.
A long time ago, there was firm evidence that ZDebug does
not play well with "sendmail" (- list archives).
But, I had thought, this had
Erik Stephens writes:
Does anyone know what kinds of operations fall under 'system'? Task
switching, paging, these kinds of things?
The computer can execute instruction being part of the operating
system (usually priviledged code) or of user processes.
The first would be accounted for as
At 03:53 PM 3/2/01 -0500, R. David Murray wrote:
On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Shane Hathaway wrote:
"Phillip J. Eby" wrote:
One reason I've been racing like mad to get the preview release out is so
that, after seeing the usefulness of TW for the Zope 3 component
architecture, y'all might be
"Phillip J. Eby" wrote:
At 03:53 PM 3/2/01 -0500, R. David Murray wrote:
I could be wrong, but I didn't read what Phillip wrote as saying he was
suggesting TransWarp as a player in the Module Persistence implementation,
but rather that he wanted people to see the value of TransWarp first
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Itai Tavor writes:
On Zope 2.3.0 and 2.3.1b1, the following method produces an error
when ZDebug is installed; If I remove ZDebug, it works fine.
A long time ago, there was firm evidence that ZDebug does
not play well with "sendmail" (- list archives).
Hello all,
I've been working on an implementation of connection pooling for the
MySQLDA. Basically, Zope connections will be pooled by connection
string to reduce the number of unecessary connections to MySQL. The
number of connections will be reduced in 2 respects: 1) Multiple
threads will
Shane Hathaway wrote:
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Itai Tavor writes:
On Zope 2.3.0 and 2.3.1b1, the following method produces an error
when ZDebug is installed; If I remove ZDebug, it works fine.
A long time ago, there was firm evidence that ZDebug does
not play well with
At 12:39 PM 3/2/01 -0500, Shane Hathaway wrote:
We've been separating concerns in the PTK/CMF for the last year now.
We've been moving as many responsibilities of the content objects as
possible into per-portal "service" objects. The services provide user
interface, discussion capability,
20 matches
Mail list logo
