Re: [Zope-dev] Does creating REAL over-the-web Python code become realistic with Zope 2.4?

2001-06-01 Thread E. Seifert
Hi Joachim, Joachim Werner wrote on Friday, June 01, 2001 12:54 AM: If we can reload Python code at runtime, and we can also edit, generate and store files (containing code) via the web (as LocalFS or extFile prove), then it should be perfectly possible to have something like ZClasses (it

Re: [Zope-dev] ANNOUNCE: Zope 2.4.0 alpha 1 released

2001-06-01 Thread Lalo Martins
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 07:33:43AM +1000, Albert Langer wrote: A note to component developers - as of Zope 2.4 ExtensionClass has not been updated to support all of the new magic protocols that Python classes support (we're hoping that EC will go away soon). What does hoping that EC will

Re: [Zope-dev] ANNOUNCE: Zope 2.4.0 alpha 1 released

2001-06-01 Thread Erik Enge
On Thu, 31 May 2001, Brian Lloyd wrote: Zope 2.4.0 alpha 1 has been released - you can download it from Zope.org: Cool stuff. I have a couple of comments, though. For future ref., should I post them to the Collector? - lib/python/Products/PluginIndexes/__init__.py is missing the ZPL - why

Re: [Zope-dev] ANNOUNCE: Zope 2.4.0 alpha 1 released

2001-06-01 Thread Matt Hamilton
- the version.txt in lib/python/ says: Zope 2.4.0a1 (source release, python 1.5.2, linux2) which sounds a bit funny in my ears... Might be me, I dunno. Actually I have wondered something about that... Why does it always show up as linux2 even when not on linux? I'm on FreeBSD using a

Re: [Zope-dev] dtml-in batching improved

2001-06-01 Thread Ivo van der Wijk
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 05:36:21PM +0100, Chris Withers wrote: I've done it myself as well using (as described in the posting) two dtml-in's (the second one purely for displaying the prev/next links). Is your solution any different? (The only one I can think of is storing the info in

Re: [Zope-dev] Does creating REAL over-the-web Python code becomerealistic with Zope 2.4?

2001-06-01 Thread R. David Murray
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, E. Seifert wrote: at http://dev.zope.org/Resources/ZopeDirections.html: The major goal will be to simplify how components (now called products) are built and used. For example, currently some products are built in the filesystem and some are built in the object database.

RE: [Zope-dev] ANNOUNCE: Zope 2.4.0 alpha 1 released

2001-06-01 Thread sean . upton
My impression is that FileStorage implements a 32-bit id-type-thingy somewhere (look at ZODB docs, I think there is something about this somewhere), which limits it (in addition to the Linux kernel ext2 fs limit), to 2GB. With 7.5 GB, I'd use a more advanced storage like the new - well, not

RE: [Zope-dev] ANNOUNCE: Zope 2.4.0 alpha 1 released

2001-06-01 Thread R. David Murray
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My impression is that FileStorage implements a 32-bit id-type-thingy somewhere (look at ZODB docs, I think there is something about this somewhere), which limits it (in addition to the Linux kernel ext2 fs limit), to 2GB. With 7.5 GB, I'd use a

RE: [Zope-dev] ANNOUNCE: Zope 2.4.0 alpha 1 released

2001-06-01 Thread sean . upton
Perhaps I was looking at old docs, as the docs had indicated that filestorage uses 32-bit position pointers; I'm guessing that this has since changed... Sean -Original Message- From: R. David Murray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 9:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc:

Re: [Zope-dev] ANNOUNCE: Zope 2.4.0 alpha 1 released

2001-06-01 Thread Paul Everitt
As one more example, Zope.org is currently at 4.8 Gb on FileStorage. --Paul R. David Murray wrote: On Fri, 1 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My impression is that FileStorage implements a 32-bit id-type-thingy somewhere (look at ZODB docs, I think there is something about this

Re: [Zope-dev] ANNOUNCE: Zope 2.4.0 alpha 1 released

2001-06-01 Thread Paul Everitt
Lalo Martins wrote: By hoping that EC will go away soon, I assume they mean the PythonLabs folks are working on fixing this for once in Python itself. Right? That is correct. The point is, ExtensionClass machinery will go away but the functionality would remain, if Python changes in the

Re: [Zope-dev] ANNOUNCE: Zope 2.4.0 alpha 1 released

2001-06-01 Thread Shane Hathaway
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My impression is that FileStorage implements a 32-bit id-type-thingy somewhere (look at ZODB docs, I think there is something about this somewhere), which limits it (in addition to the Linux kernel ext2 fs limit), to 2GB. With 7.5 GB, I'd use a more advanced

Re: [Zope-dev] ANNOUNCE: Zope 2.4.0 alpha 1 released

2001-06-01 Thread marc lindahl
Does anyone have any comments on the reliability of PartitionedFileStorage in this regard as a temporary solution? Is anyone using PartitionedFileStorage in a production environment? AFAIK no. Its functionality has already been superceded. by?

Re: [Zope-dev] ANNOUNCE: Zope 2.4.0 alpha 1 released

2001-06-01 Thread Shane Hathaway
marc lindahl wrote: Does anyone have any comments on the reliability of PartitionedFileStorage in this regard as a temporary solution? Is anyone using PartitionedFileStorage in a production environment? AFAIK no. Its functionality has already been superceded. by?

Re: [Zope-dev] ANNOUNCE: Zope 2.4.0 alpha 1 released

2001-06-01 Thread Chris McDonough
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With 7.5 GB, I'd use a more advanced storage like the new - well, not quite released ;) - Berkeley (libdb3 based) storages... snip Just so there's no misunderstanding... BerkeleyStorage is in beta... it's at http://www.zope.org/Products/bsddb3Storage

Re: [Zope-dev] ANNOUNCE: Zope 2.4.0 alpha 1 released

2001-06-01 Thread Chris McDonough
Shane Hathaway wrote: by? BerkeleyDB3Storage. Actually, it hasn't. bsddb is no better at big files than FileStorage. ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding!

Re: [Zope-dev] SOAP again (or, xml-rpc client for MSIE)

2001-06-01 Thread Hannu Krosing
Phil Harris wrote: Brad, There are a few COM/COM+ components around that do xml-rpc. I use them with MS Word to write Word files directly to Zope for instance. Some are better than others, but ymmv so I'll hesitate to recommend one. At least one of them is listed on xmlrpc.com.