[Zope-dev] characters allowed in object IDs

2006-03-10 Thread yuppie
Hi! As of Zope 2.8.2 (http://svn.zope.org/?rev=38738view=rev) the '@' character is allowed in object IDs. Zope 3 does not allow object IDs starting with '@' because those names are reserved for views. Five makes Zope 3 style views available in Zope 2, so IDs starting with '@' should be

[Zope-dev] Re: characters allowed in object IDs

2006-03-10 Thread Max M
yuppie wrote: Hi! As of Zope 2.8.2 (http://svn.zope.org/?rev=38738view=rev) the '@' character is allowed in object IDs. Zope 3 does not allow object IDs starting with '@' because those names are reserved for views. Five makes Zope 3 style views available in Zope 2, so IDs starting with

[Zope-dev] Re: characters allowed in object IDs

2006-03-10 Thread yuppie
Max M wrote: yuppie wrote: As of Zope 2.8.2 (http://svn.zope.org/?rev=38738view=rev) the '@' character is allowed in object IDs. Zope 3 does not allow object IDs starting with '@' because those names are reserved for views. Five makes Zope 3 style views available in Zope 2, so IDs starting

Re: [Zope-dev] characters allowed in object IDs

2006-03-10 Thread Dieter Maurer
yuppie wrote at 2006-3-10 12:14 +0100: As of Zope 2.8.2 (http://svn.zope.org/?rev=38738view=rev) the '@' character is allowed in object IDs. Zope 3 does not allow object IDs starting with '@' because those names are reserved for views. Five makes Zope 3 style views available in Zope 2, so IDs

[Zope-dev] Re: characters allowed in object IDs

2006-03-10 Thread yuppie
Dieter Maurer wrote: yuppie wrote at 2006-3-10 12:14 +0100: As of Zope 2.8.2 (http://svn.zope.org/?rev=38738view=rev) the '@' character is allowed in object IDs. Zope 3 does not allow object IDs starting with '@' because those names are reserved for views. Five makes Zope 3 style views

[Zope-dev] Re: characters allowed in object IDs

2006-03-10 Thread Max M
yuppie wrote: Dieter Maurer wrote: To support WebDAV as widely as possible, I would prefer to get rid of all id restrictions. I do not like to see new restrictions emerging... You just don't like it or do you know a better alternative? We need a way to make sure that object IDs can't mask